CTA Case No. 1629 (Decision)
~ I ~EPUlU.IC OP TBR p.HJUPPI:N~ OOURT OF TAX A-PPE-'.UJ,. QUEZON CITT �' D c - -' � ~1l1 -- ... .. .. ~- ....� � I � ' � t ' l� .:122
ttl tltl: �" t~ 8 tif pclt�l I 1 Wedt aml I - 195'? . 19,a, (lnii'I"'DftA s wr � . 1 bCUiht 1 .� affix to � � lt,o,- - .� � rt,ontJUy a �t nt . o �. '. 4 _ pol � 7 'bu.Jl:tu:t :r� r :tater l�� e � ��� -� :r- ,ft . th ' tl OWl nt WU ttl tnfcaod Q S Oh lo$t� � p I� tion , . 1 t u61 .. �r�� Sye1p, 1 . let' r ~- Jtlly 1~t l9S9 � . in stlg tio ot �d,d lo& 1 rns� o.nd a (Htrtai,u h3' � p t!. :ton r t 1 . t� a t � 1GWumt 111 , t. sn . � Glt � It ti\lri . � 't 1._, ~ alleg <U.y fAil t tb1n the 't~iD pre ..,.._.....wdOl'l J1 th t Wl"ttt. $ l ��� Retula,ion Ho . Y-1 . d-.n in. 1 t� b r 1, 19 2, t � o at;mlQUJ:xeu ��'�1:7 ' s �'~�amvr ��� foP t PaJ'li at r .f.ocr..a the 128
.,. . � �1 .�
-- to~ t � r 11 t l' aile I o. 1 i t :0 OOf.le / 130
.... NO. l - s- ( l - -~ �l �t t �( ) $ t1.S:& - � 1 t.l ' ( -) �� ll t1oft of ~I, -� ) � r, de � ' 'l' r� 0 po * .1Cb � t 131
� ..J � 16 -- G1 �l adt1 t 132
'.' .. - ;., - .) ' _,_ 0'azr.o ~andu for ! ts .,C!Md nt. H Nh l l ,n~1p9l6l9e1d � ) re o.; Utldal'GC.Odng -� 19 � 200 ; C'Z.~ whil� : ~poltdent d<>ellt not il-1l3'p t tb.G ~:rcb4aae t <10 n.t~\: sta iha �nd ...}u~ir '.Cfi.; ture t he a1.llest at� p .�ta:t on the !tVtur no o tnt � 1 no de pa1d :tn oont :mpla ion ot th � le.w. Petlt1an r, o tbe oth r bs.n~, counto-r.-� tl ttt tb. req tr~d coeumeuttl!'J' ant! .b 1? aff1nure to the ~usine s � tG~n~t � an � . poll f: 1 t�a:- � j, ti'! d of to tlu~ inwrance polloi. , if ~&uffi �1 n �� ()Gmpl! n w t law. :Jn ot .,. we~ , it t!o ntary J.t r.up. to th dJ' :tht t o� lnt � J. by h � i� ., 1n$U~ance pol11e . 1rt this ca e, do a ~I 133
f;lf�1 10� ""' C'tA CJ :) Nt.. 1629 -... . 1$ tb t p ltlOUl: b F:ffi;;r. d to t' 4oc " t:s . t~ , , \ofh! .l'l in t ~:t~; c a ( Tie ffbr:.-u of' t:ift~l. t~ntat"f " �~"pa to pa e s othe~r tho m1�nor1 ~ .o by lnw :i.s no$ t�tam ""mt 1�o fail� � afti � t ' t fell b p !:~ b pettt1o � 'fh r t � o l&gal ~u .. ion or r~~po :..den tc :r w:ir{.t \'!- ti S<nt :r- to y a1n t . do.. ntary et ~P a . '\t.il ieh it a tl� r.-e y aid. 'Jo us a in r � ondilt1t � stant.l � ~1a � ul� f.o e� ano1: ltl � trrot'!e dad a a1n t f: r f\Et1lu e eotnply rith 'l. r qui:;; ent o1: .l'f'i .in~t thEt doeu ent ~t to the �r; .:tr :blQ\ i,tsu:..'anee ulbd.eJ l.(tl!l nQt fot t 1lur tQ p tb.t> t x. (st s c� � 3 ]tt2� ~ � � co ��'J ( It filiO"Uld $ cbee'l" �ec. t11at tb. law l l � s ffixtt:tt . oi' t!OC1lr.ct ta, y p ,. o t~nch .the 1 m ;r be 1. ~. 1 t � y law e:r r g l tie I' $ th' ;p... op r- 134
� - v � � t 1 .) l p i I� .) r Ye � 1�
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.