cta_decision CTA Case No. 19021902 1977-03-07

CTA Case No. 1902 (Decision)

H� II IC Of 1 i� Pf-l!Llt�J:I �") 0 . CUU RT OF '1 AX APPEA LS . ' QUb..tON CITY . Ail'' usi t . .ba .. e -- ..- no �.~..;g ."t-Qtl ~~t,t..; t en~.r th.ft t. ~u t -- ..., ; ,2 l ..SO ~n s~ e-1. ~1-e t x on ?17., 1t63 g ug lit .re .t �1� 1 , .3~1 on; pJreo!' .l t r� of cr;~a l~'H1til . . ~~ '~"'olltfw!~ A~f" tb � . ta"� ""rrr l"..,Qt,Ltic �. tten �~-~ IS!:r 13:L

t e iA..,;;.~.C � tha �' ��T'A...t .. t l -A7, ' .. {�\ . 1 iv... 1. I" tl n .. ,., ' !, s

� �� � -� ' 133

-- sugar

) .' -. d '"h t �m:l .. t T"- f. 1 r rc .n :r. Jl"> ... a .t r r '-�' or ... ., -� ... f: t n �� '.-� :t-... +v of ;; t:o 1 c '; f ' n' Ir wJ , f.')t , t .-..l.- t. ,. +. .... t

I �l . ec 1o - 6- ot th C d whi lo . t .t 1 t ly u 0 tt t I .9 l 6 , al obol -~ "' ieh fi , or y r � o oth r ' wn le tor th l � t r u d o th t of - o tb g1 1 tur ot tnt ot to ou � �(Co .U t t t1 e t v 1. I I �'~o . t 5 19 ' � 3094.), in s t1 n 1,.,9 t'he % ' Co whic 1 te ubl!c Ctt o. 160 t t ti t tat foll 'W t tt ttac t:~ t low- s itic t t (J t till

.... � l9 -... ...

� - � h � .1 1_38

l 4! -- i 1 � 1 l1 � t If 1. 3 8

- �� tfO \

� 11 II (

.� 1 " .. 2 - II

.� l ... l . s~nt

. ' - /

�, �l ... , _ .. ' l "' 0 't 0 (,! ' 1 �:t. i t .. 0 0 o -v t o V~ 1 r .. ti r t 145

... � 1 2 - 16 - ' r .. � 0� t l t 1 1t, t1 b - t 1 1" � 1 t e> � ' 7 197 � J ~~- �I ra_1:~� i'Lp.~~)'~~_ J~f\� -dJ ~ ' lei 1 !.16

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.