jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 41811. May 29, 1934 ] 1934-05-29

[ G. R. No. 41811. May 29, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 41811. May 29, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 41811

[ G. R. No. 41811. May 29, 1934 ]

MANUEL GARCIA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE VS. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CASTILLA, SORSOGON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________29th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Sorsogon________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellants.

It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________the sum of Pxx__________xx__________ , as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.