CTA Case No. 3850 (Resolution)
�t:.�;uBLlC OF thE f'HtLlt't' ��'~~~ ' ~OURT OF TAX APPEALB Q\JEitON Cf!'Y GRAtJE PORT �MI�JUFACTURI G CORPORATION , Petitioner , - versus - C � T �A � CASE NO � 3850 THE COt.� ,tJ. SSIOLER OF I NTBlNAL REV H.JUE , Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X R ES 0 LUT I 0 N Considering the failure of petitioner 's counsel to a ppe ar at the scheduled hearing of this case on Novemb er 27 , 1986 despite proper notice th ereof , th e r epeated postponements of the he aring an d the pen- dency of this case since October 19, 1984, this Court upon motion of respon de nt in open court, resolves to dismiss the above-entitled case for non-appearance and lack of interest on the part of petitioner to pro- secute i t s appeal . SO 0 D ED � Que zon City , Metro Ma nila , Febru nry 6 , 198 7. AIVlAI'JTE Presidi
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 5010 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 5010)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. APEX CHEMICAL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1382)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. RICHELLE SORIANO LEONARDO (At Large), No.28 Masalipit Street, San Miguel, Meycauayan, Bulacan, and or No.6 Fatima Street, Maryville Townhomes, Saluysoy, Meycauayan, Bulacan(CTA Case No. O-300)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LTD.(CTA Case No. EB 1799)
- HEIRS OF SPOUSES EDUARDO M. FRANCO and CELIA C. FRANCO namely, Maria Isabel C. Franco-Ignacio, Ferdinand C. Franco, Maria Cecilia C. Franco-Cruz, and the Heirs of Eduardo C. Franco, Jr. namely, Nancy A. Franco, Ivy Christine A. Franco, Franchesca Mae A. Franco-Lukban, Junile Emancel A. Franco, Marian Edylene A. Franco and Eduardo Angelo A. Franco v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF VALENZUELA CITY (formerly CTA Case No. 11003)(CTA Case No. SCA-0002)
- CTA Case No. 3992 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3992)
- CARMEN COPPER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9659)
- PHILIPPINE VENDING CORPORATION, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9785)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.