CTA Case No. 72 (Decision)
/ RErUBLir::: '"'-.;- TIIr::: P.::IILlPPIN ES COU.R1 t<� '1 /,_.~( APPE.ALS.- MA.NLLA. . -.. . . . . -- .� . l 1 l l 51) � ly � � . 1 .. � 151 /Sb ...
� 72 .,. � 2. 'I � la }. 5. � � 152
- � 1 � 1 �� � 1 t � ns �� -� � � . ; S.2 153
7 -. �� 0 � h - � t t~ � fo !53 (' 15 4
� 72 �� 1 }. at () y � � � � � i II t y � f th rt 1 n c 1 i� nly t i n t 1 t tl. ;sri 15 5 �
-. �i i 1 ty , in� ' f �;) 0� p � � � � t & c t �� v tt ..~ f ., J �� f I 156 L
c. IS � 72 -- et � 1 - � � ic :t:} . 21. ( �� e �l � .1 1 t 1 t fo '. � � i 157
- 8- t pi (. t '/ p it ic ve na � \0 f' in Q 'h I t hl pl:t. \ n c ... t 1 0 n p .. ti 1 3 but i 1 cover only h ,. ri l 15 8
E � '72 -- .( " of t Ae ft r � sine t t 1 ly ti of ch dl � le t xpli �t i � c not ' fun _ li t uf n �u- r ) � 1 n n r nsa t_ ons y pprov f h tl e et 1 .. :~ 15 9
.� 7 .. lJ - ( hp n . of � t les ~. s ou 0 bt t ghc.. f iticn !!C6 it i8 f tol� 1 ~c J or � i in pur~~..dn ht d fo tif~S. t( a unl t tap~ duly t in ceor nc ~'J.t h 0 isi ,. rJti ~ c 0 I J.n t oe u ut - y (-. n .:; ng � 0"" ..J . Ph" � ~l4.' l nd y 0 0 X' v ' t 1 c or t sin:vl n in pr 4... 0 h Ol: c �i �( � sr 0 ta cl t in t n c s l t pr c r �r n t rf ;. 160
. � .. cD CIS JC .A. � 12 � 11 .. tva 1 is 6).2 it d te :.l;t ( Int ri la "E r ss o. �~�� 1 � t 27 < il. � � a i i 'l � reby, ci e p titio � � ~an~l"' , .: ippin $ o o .... ~ � ""' eonc 1: ~~ r i in J 161 ; , l>
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.