CTA Case No. 2437 (Decision)
.. .' t . l . S��~
- - .... ...
.. -
. ' - .. t1tl.oner ~ SU.'P(�J'lll'>l'�l.l'�� To ; ' r t n">ti l tie o:: 1 ti 1 r to t e c t or ot th hil P� 1 ce ou inu t c: m r b li~ , �e t ., ari '
. - 7- r'
�7 - �
-� 37 -? .. et ti n-r' $ t ~t it . s 0 li� to �n. thilel it i � , 1 the bil1p.pi es . .t - !fie ... or plaeer r ~ � $1 f!,$ heril. t b~&- :.i e t � 1 "� a tt r lu t 1 t e ~� le tre,t ~ u f �r 1 .s e lal cl~ nt tb , the �117 to tax a to tt ,_ r ubje t d sc c t i t _. r t. ,~ i~ � 'I
-. er . oti . , ent �or � t ' '
-
... 1 � ,. t� i t ..~ w q 1 <)t t - ,rJ �' 10
... 7 - � 'b. th. i~ ' hi ~atic or hw itn- !' ot r~ � o � 1 53 ;lt- .f" '� ? i n"; 9 ' '!:'t ... e d 11 1 pr ., L � 'f � Com- Tr d 1'& 1 .Jl t v :u ... , �a. ~ t 71 . t. ril 3. , ;. l. . 11
7 - 1 ., 12
7 -. t t .~ 1) () 1 t n( 1t - .. .. t .ee � r > n
�. ; -1 .' 1 ... 4 t ttl " ,q ' �-i$ ' 1 !}.
� 2 37 ;; ... l - i ...... � , ' hl �� ��� 1t ;- r( 15
.. l _ � l i io tt t � ,~ tif ';, 16
� )7 - 11 - t t � s� . � 3 ' 1, ! (~ 17
-- l ... ', 1... t t
� l.t37 a 1i t'O � I. 0 't lc ; 1 � t tt 1 e-o � hi d 1 "' s t n..,o r ' t �� 3l ! 1 !' 1 19
- ., l � 3l r 1 t' t .19 r l" ~ � r) ot e .~. '" .. or ..... "' 0 _l �� �n u <:l ... 1 1 ti tv 20
� .., . 7 - 1- or ~n11anl~S t.l- tt 1 f� ... ' t� ~ 1 du � rt en t. the ' t e� t Yd. l rl1 { Ir t 11 i ri al ti 1'11 t 1 )I
.�, -. . .... 1 t1 31 e 1 I � 1 1 t 7. �� I 1i It t 1 r t i 1- ... o :1. 30 �
- � ... 1 - 23 - 1 0 t t t on � � ty 1977. a.-~~ /7 . ci t~~~d;~v lJ ~- . '. � 23
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.