SEC En Banc Case No. 12-17-435 In Re: Petition to Lift SEC Order of Revocation Dated 26 August 2002 - FIL-SYN CORPORATION

PICC Secretariat Building, PICC Complex, Pasay City Securities and Exchange Commission Republic of the Philippines Department of Finance

Commission En Banc

IN RE: PETITION TO LIFT SEC ORDER OF REVOCATION DATED 26 AUGUST 2002 FIL-SYN CORPORATION, Petitioner SEC EN BANC CASE NO. 12-17-435 (SEC CFD-AA-Case No. 10-03-44)

ORDER

Statements for Calendar Year 1996, in violation of SRC Rule 17. SYN), which seeks to lift the 26 August 2002 Order of Revocation of the Effectivity of FIL- original fine of P2,139,600) because of FIL-SYN's failure to timely file its Audited Financial SYN's Registration of Securities and Permit to Sell Securities to the Public issued by the Commission's Corporate Finance Department (CFD) pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC). The CFD imposed a fine in the amount of P534,900 (as reduced from the This resolves the Petition dated 7 December 2017 filed by FIL-SYN CORPORATION (FIL-

claiming good faith, which was denied by the CFD in Letter-Order dated 4 March 2003. On 14 January 2003, FIL-SYN filed a Letter/Motion for Reconsideration with the CFD

the penalty is disproportionate to the offense, which was denied by the CFD in a Letter-Order dated 21 October 2003. However, in the same Letter-Order, the CFD reduced the fine to P534,900 from the original amount of P2,139,600. On 12 March 2003, FIL-SYN again filed a Letter/Motion for Reconsideration claiming that

not pay the reduced fine of P534,900 because of financial difficulty. On 11 November 2003, FIL-SYN filed a Motion for Reconsideration, claiming that it could

Reconsideration and further stating that: "Following completion of the payme. obligation, the Order of Revocation dated 26 August 2002 shall be lifted through an issuance of an Order.' On 27 November 2003, the CFD issued an Orderi denying FIL-SYN's Motion for t of the entire

P534,900 On 21 February 2005, FIL-SYN paid the last of ten installments for the total amount of

However, no Order to Lift Revocation was issued. On 23 February 2005, the CFD issued an Order2 acknowledging FIL-SYN's payment.

transferred to the Commission's Markets and Securities Regulation Department (MSRD). Meanwhile, in September 2013, the authority to issue a license to sell securities was

Hence, this Petition to Lift Order of the Revocation before the En Banc.

both the MSRD and the En Banc, such that it was docketed twice. It has come to the attention of the En Banc that the instant Petition has been filed with

Resolution No. 94, Series of 2018, where FIL-SYN was ordered to amend its Registration The Petition filed with MSRD was elevated to the En Banc, leading to the issuance of SEc

1 Annex F of the instant Petition 2 Annex I of the instant Petition

IN RE: FIL-SYN CORPORATION SEC EB Case No. 12-17-435 Page 2 of 2 Statement and to submit the same to the MSRD for the reinstatement of FIL-SYN's permit to sell securities, viz:

RESOLVED tO:

to reflect any material changes prior to reinstatement of its registration statement and permit to sell securities; and 1) DIRECT Filsyn Corporation to AMEND its Registration Statement

authority of the Commission, the corresponding Order Lifting the Order of Revocation dated 26 August 2002 against Filysyn 2) FILE with the Markets and Securities Regulation Department (MSRD) the AMENDED Registration Statement, reflecting the material changes, to enable the Director of the MSRD to issue, by Corporation.

Resolution, has rendered the instant case moot. and Permit to Sell Securities to the Public filed by FIL-SYN with the MSRD and identical to the present Petition, having been elevated and already decided by the En Banc in the abovementioned Therefore, the Petition for Lifting of Revocation of Effectivity of Registration of Securities

identical Petitions with multiple departments of the Commission, which partakes of the nature of forum shopping. As mentioned, FIL-SYN filed identical Petitions with the MSRD and with the En Banc, wasting the time and effort of the Commission. Nevertheless, the En Banc shall take this occasion to address the practice of filing

the Certification against Forum Shopping, and its legal counsel HERRERA TEEHANKEE & Subsequent attempts will be dealt with more severely. CABRERA LAW OFFICES are hereby cited and reminded of the rules against forum shopping. Petitioner FIL-SYN CORPORATION, its President JAIME M. STO. DOMINGO who executed

WHEREFORE, the Petition dated 7 December 2017 is hereby CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED.

Pasay City, Philippines; 12 July 2018

EmiliO B. AQuino Chairperson wWn

Cmie deu-be ANTONIETA F. IBE Commissioner EPHYRO LUIS B. AMATONG Commissioner JAVEY PAUL D. FRANCISCO Commissioner