DIAGEO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court ofTax Appeals QUEZON CITY Third Division DIAGEO PHILIPPINES, INC., CTA CAS E NO. 8312 Petitioner, Present: -versu s- COMMISSIONER OF BAUTISTA, Chairperson, and INTERNAL REVENUE, FABON-VICTORINO, fl. Respondent. Promulgated: APR 2 2 2013 -~~~ - ~--~�,_ X - --- - ---- --- --- - --------------------- -- ----- � RESOLUTION On March 11, 2013, petitioner filed a "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review," stating that on January 30, 2013, its Board of Directors approved the withdrawal of all of its claims for refund of input value-added tax (VAT) pending with the Court of Tax Appeals and Supreme Court, including the above-captioned case. On March 18, 2013, the Court promulgated a Resolution ordering respondent to comment on petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review," within ten (10) days from notice thereof. Per Records Verification Certification dated April 16, 2013, respondent failed to file her comment on petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review." WHEREFORE, there being no opposition, petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review" is hereby GRANTED. The Petition for Review is hereby deemed WITHDRAWN. This case is hereby considered CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED.
RESOLUTION CTA CASE No. 8312 Diageo Philippines, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue As so
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.