[ G. R. No. 39852. May 31, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39852. May 31, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39852
[ G. R. No. 39852. May 31, 1934 ]
PLACIDO GUINTO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. PASAY TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________14th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________7th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, it being undestood that the defendant corporation shall pay the plaintiffs the sum of P800.00, with the costs of this instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiffs-appellees___________ recover from ___________the defendant-appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 39416. May 22, 1934 ]
- G.R. No. 109814, July 08, 1997
- G.R. No. 177740, April 05, 2010
- [ G.R. No. 171729. July 28, 2008 ](582 Phil. 232)
- [ G.R. No. L-2726. September 29, 1950 ]
- [ G.R. No. 227069. November 22, 2017 ](821 Phil. 651; 114 OG No. 35, 6205 (August 27, 2018))
- [ G.R. No. L-576. August 04, 1948 ]
- G.R. No. 120140, August 21, 1996
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.