CTA Case No. 1628 (Decision)
.. .. 1 --- UC 01" T COURT IF 1' p .i io� ~. .$ c 0 J ~ o. 1628 -- xJj� ~\~~ F d . -- .. X ... ... ... ... ...� 1 1 1 or c1 Sl gi 1 af f chi c t 0 e �1 195 6, rio X t i 1, 51 t. e 196 .. i a eorpor t1o 0 1 ell und 1" 1 \t p s, 1 l 10 � y� th . c� n nh l rb 1 c.ricl 1 � in t liS !':ine s, 0 r nt d n 1921 cil e 0. � � .1e 1r �1 � '� t or ... :� 212
C cIO - � 16 , 19 , t � ' 0 r e 11 l .' 1 b 15 . !' 2 1 3
c n ' 1 1. t t tn ( tl on it c 11, 1 61 1, 51 � ( ?r�'l c t on 7 1 �� 1� ,u ., - � ... 7, , � p �. t n J, t �h -r ot rn 1. n 167r{l . r- X,, io . :!.n t 1, t - r ' t� od 1 16 � l t er a July 27, t ( .1 t '1 2 .) n c '/1 t 1 '4:- � � 214
�1 . ) - 1; � 1 � 1 1� 215
. ... � .' tf , t 0 1 I� 2'1 7
7 - ') � �t -� 1'1 I ., ~J . � �~ � ., � Col .� � u1 f 6, 0"3 . 2!7 01 d:r , e . .(19; ) .. , .. .. .. " . . . .. . . ., . .. d � � � � ~~~~~!�- 1 218 ''
. c -. 11 � �� -' 2r 1 ~. 219
3 ' n h1 ac , prov. t x ot 21'. 'f i �� 41 60 n l Co r a Ic Pl t c o. � �C � 1 . ot tnt r l . ' 100 Phil. 50; 1 e !'1 Co �� �~ A. v. 'ttll'l'l 1 . .... ~ n c: r~ c r .~. ,u n h ��� r d o 11 ex! rn s 18h publio . ot �fo . of. a i h r ta � p t ti :n r, w. t o sub ct t e t 0 l. tioav st bl d 1 *'" � or tl $"' ov d co l" t1on r t r. . 1 1 t �� r r1 o t r ilip- tX 0 tor etrie e r.r t sold und r � :.. 220
-j � .,. ' 1 l .tl t l e� dh 221
'2 1 � � '71 ) " ' 1 p � 11 1t P1' .... 'C t t1 11 11'1& t " 3? ) .. .I. ... . (~ ) 1; 1 ,. �� �h :y f. ir.r b t'ltl f .Ae � r th f c-;. 1 5'3. 1rl' er- p 1: difi l t ,.on tr:ots 0 {50 � l � 6 �36 ). � rn :1. i p ' . re r.t.JlO 0 ha 1' ec c at i h rt 0
�� 1 or � � �
� � 1628 13 . ~t r ' t tb. � .' .ro de sting, 73 l'h11. 4-08) . '1 1ss �to no hat ec� t o - 259 r� h R enu o its . lf pr id to:r t di f of' a n t, ak no uno on titu 1o.n las J.: te:. ~1g ol or th rul or uniformity at taDt:.t.o.o . I n um, ar of th opinion and 0 ht>ld \ that p t t1o _ 1 ot .11 le for 'J~ r n� h s: t x a 5~ surch r o it gro r e 1 t for ,, h period � fro u 11t-, 19'6 to J n 30 , . 195'6 ll d from J n 195? 0 c m ~ 1, 1960. How- ' V ti ti on s 11 for th . 6,339 . 27 a ~ d ~ ci c . chi t X for th er e:. fr i 1, 56 (.) ;] 13, 19;6 , ;x... clus ve or 2;~ for 1 t p ym n � .'JI!! 'P"ORE t h d c �s1o.n Pfl al d tr 1 t ereby 1 1 � Petitio r is hereby ord$r d to yr t co � t f 6,339 --27 efi� 01 .:-'iCY ra cl ise tax !'or th p riod tro Fil 1 ,, 1956 to J 1.me 13, 1956, wi th()u ronoun<.: m nt � s to CI')S s . u -� . o '"'1ty, Sept ein~e r 30, 196 fv~ '/-~ <' 0 � , VA 1CErl As eiat 3 tl
More in CTA Decisions
- SPC REALTY CORPORATION v. MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF CAINTA(CTA Case No. EB 985)
- CTA Case No. 3221 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3221)
- CTA Case No. 3697 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3697)
- EAST WEST BANKING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7090)
- SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL AB v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8579)
- CTA Case No. 2846 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2846)
- WGC, INC. represented by its President, WILLIAM G. CHU v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, BIR REVENUE DISTRICT REGION NO. 16 and BIR REVENUE DISTRICT NO. 98, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY, and REGIONAL TRIAL COURT BRANCH 38, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY(CTA Case No. AC-124)
- CTA Case No. 48 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 48)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.