jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 40636. August 10, 1934 ] 1934-08-10

[ G. R. No. 40636. August 10, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 40636. August 10, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 40636

[ G. R. No. 40636. August 10, 1934 ]

OCEJO POMAR Y CIA. , PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. RAMON CHAVEZ ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila________, dated the _________28th__________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the defendants-appellants

It is further ordered that __________the plaintiffs-appellees__________ recover from _________the defendants-appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.