cta_resolution CTA Case No. EB 1368EB 1368 2017-07-24

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MCKINSEY & CO. (PHILS.)

Republic of the Philippines COURT OF TAX APPEALS Quezon City ENBANC COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL CTA EB No.1368 REVENUE, (CTA Case No. 8472) Petitioner, Present: DEL ROSARIO, Pj., -versus- CASTANEDA, JR., BAUTISTA, MCKINSEY & CO., (PHILS.), Respondent. UY, CASANOVA, FABON-VICTORINO, MINDARO-GRULLA, RINGPIS-LIBAN, and MANAHAN,].]. Promulgated: Jill 24 2017 ~A- )(- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION CASANOVA, J.: For resolution is petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration, filed thru registered mail, on March 27, 2017, with respondent's Comment/Opposition (To Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration), filed on May 29, 2017. In his Motion, petitioner seeks reconsideration of this Court's Decision dated February 27, 2017, denying his Petition for Review, the dispositive portion thereof reads as follows, viz: "Finding no cogent reason to reverse or deviate from the Assailed Decision and Assailed....-

RESOLUTION CTA EB NO. 1368 (CTA Case No. 8472) Resolution, We deny petitioner's Petition for Review for lack of merit. SO ORDERED." We have carefully perused the Motion for Reconsideration and find no valid or compelling reason to grant the same. The grounds and arguments therein are mere rehash of his arguments in the Petition for Review filed before this Court, and, likewise, the arguments in his Motion for Reconsideration filed thru registered mail on May 8, 2015 with the Court in Division which had already been exhaustively discussed and passed upon in this Court's Decision dated February 27, 2017. We, thus, find no merit in the instant Motion for Reconsideration as the same did not raise any new, cogent or substantial ground to warrant reconsideration of this Court's Decision dated February 27, 2017. WHEREFORE, petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. _#- CAESAR A. CASANOVA Associate Justice Presiding Justice fJ( ~ c.<:W-~~. 9 LOVEL� BAUTISTA Associate Justice JUKNITO C~ CASTANEDA, Associate Justice

RESOLUTION CTA EB NO. 1368 (CTA Case No. 8472) ERL~.UY . FABON-VICTORINO Associate Justice CAitJ; N. M~~C~ ~. ~ ~'--- CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice Associate Justice ~~~ CATHERINE T. MANAHAN Associate Justice

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.