[ G. R. No. 41119. May 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41119. May 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41119
[ G. R. No. 41119. May 08, 1934 ]
SALUD SISON, ETC., PETITIONER AND APPELLANT VS. THE DIRECTOR OF PRISONS, RESPONDENT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila________, dated the __________27th__________ day of __________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ________the appellee_________ recover from __________the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as to costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. NO. 146526, May 05, 2006
- [ A.M. No. P-99-1343. July 10, 2002 ](433 Phil. 641)
- [ G.R. No. 31291. October 28, 1929 ](G.R. No. 31291)
- G.R. No. 255989, March 01, 2023
- [ G.R. No. 152927. January 14, 2004 ](464 Phil. 517; 101 OG No. 48, 8422 (November 28, 2005))
- [ Adm. Mat. No. 2428-CFI. July 31, 1981 ](193 Phil. 452; 83 OG No. 13, 1496 (March 30, 1987))
- [ A.C. NO. 6656 (FORMERLY CBD-98-591). May 04, 2006 ](523 Phil. 17)
- [ G.R. No. 69581. May 21, 1992 ](284-A Phil. 614)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.