DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES, PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY EN BANC DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE CTA EB Nos. 1763 SERVICES, PTE.LTD., (CTA Case Nos. 8623, 8656, Petitioner, 8661 & 8685) -versus- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL CTA EB No. 1764 REVENUE, (CTA Case Nos. 8623, 8656, 8661 & 8685) Respondent. x----------------------------------x COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, Present: DEL ROSARIO, P.J., -versus- CASTANEDA, JR., UY, FABON-VICTORINO, MINDARO-GRULLA, RINGPIS-LIBAN, and DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE MANAHAN, JJ. SERVICES, PTE.LTD., Respondent. Promulgated: JUN Q,2 20~ x---------------------------------------------------------c-3--,�-s-:~ s; ~ � DECISION MINDARO-GRULLA, J.: Submitted for decision on July 26, 2018 to the Court En Bane are Petitions for Review filed by Deutsche Knowledge Services, PTE, LTD., (Deutsche) and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) under Section 18, Republic Act No.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 2 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION 1125, as amended by R.A. No. 92821, seeking the reversal of the Decision2 dated 04 August 2017 and the Resolution3 dated 15 December 2017 rendered by the Third Division of this Court, the dispositive portions of which, respectively, read as follows: Decision dated August 4, 2017: "WHEREFORE, the present Petitions for Review are hereby PARTIALLY GRANTED. Accordingly, let a tax refund or a tax credit certificate be issued in favor of petitioner in the reduced amount of P17,188,625.90, representing its unutilized and excess input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales for the first, second, third, and fourth quarters of calendar year 2011. SO ORDERED." Resolution dated December 15, 2017: "WHEREFORE, the Court DENIES, for lack of merit: 1. Respondent's and Petitioner's respective Motions for Partial Reconsideration dated August 18 and 24, 2017; and 2. Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Trial incorporated in its Motion for Partial Reconsideration. SO ORDERED." 1 R.A 9282, Section 11. Section 18 of the same Act is hereby amended as follows: "SEC. 18. Appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals En Bane. - No civil proceeding involving matter arising under the National Internal Revenue Code, the Tariff and Customs Code or the Local Government Code shall be maintained, except as herein provided, until and unless an appeal has been previously filed with the CTA and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of this Act. "A party adversely affected by a resolution of a Division of the CTA on a motion for reconsideration or new trial, may file a petition for review with the CTA en bane." XXX XXX XXX 2 Penned by Associate Justice Esperanza R. Fabon- Victorino, concurred in by Associate Justice Lovell R. Bautista and Associate Justice Ma.Belen M. Ringpis-Liban, En Bane Docket, pp. 48-85. 3 !d., pp. 87-93.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 3 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION The following facts of the case as recited by the Third Division in its Decision and as established by evidence on record 4 , read as follows: "Petitioner Deutsche Knowledge Services Pte. Ltd. is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Singapore, with license to transact business in the Philippines with office address at Net Quad Center, 31st Street corner 4th Avenue, E-Square Zone Crescent Park West, Taguig City. It is a VAT-registered taxpayer as of June 16, 2005, with Taxpayer Identification No. (TIN) 238-763-115-000. Petitioner is also registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and it is licensed to do business as a regional operating headquarters (ROHQ) in the Philippines. It is engaged in general administration and planning; business planning and coordination; sourcing/procurement of raw materials and components; corporate finance advisory services; marketing control and sales promotion; training and personnel management; logistic services; research and development services and product development; technical support and maintenance; data processing and communication and business development to its affiliates in the Philippines and abroad. On the other hand, respondent is Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), with power to decide, approve, and grant refunds of internal revenue taxes or issue a tax credit certificate. He holds office at the BIR National Office Building, BIR Road, Diliman, Quezon City. Petitioner filed with the BIR its Monthly VAT Declarations and Quarterly VAT Returns through the Electronic Filing and Payments System (EFPS), for the period beginning January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 as follows: PERIOD COVERED DATE FILED January 2011 February 18, 2011 5 ' Division Docket, Joint Stipulation of Facts, pp. 489-498.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 4 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION February 2011 March 9 20116 First Quarter of 2011 April 2011 April 25, 20117 May 2011 May 19, 2011s Second Quarter of 2011 July 2011 June 17 20119 August 2011 July 22, 2011 10 Third Quarter of 2011 Auqust 18, 2011 11 October 2011 September 19 201!1 2 November 2011 October 26, 201113 Fourth Quarter of 2011 November 18, 2011 14 December 19, 2011 15 January 20, 2012 (oriqinal)16 March 14, 2013 (amended) 17 On October 31, 2012, January 9, 2013, January 23, 2013 and March 19, 2013, petitioner separately filed with the BIR Large Taxpayers Regular Audit Division 3 (LTRAD), its administrative claims for refund or issuance of TCC for its alleged unutilized input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters of 2011 in the respective amounts of P30,987,110.54, P43,483,971.55, P39,444,853.68, and P39,285,207.94 or in the aggregate amount of P153,201, 143.71. When no action was taken by respondent on its administrative claims for refund, petitioner filed with the Court four (4) separate Petitions for Review on March 27, 2013, May 20, 2013, June 19, 2013, and August 5, 2013, docketed as CTA Case Nos. 8623, 8656, 8661, and 8685, respectively. Respondent filed his Answer in CTA Case No. 8623 on June 14, 2013, in CTA Case No. 8656 on July 19, 2013, in CTA Case No. 8661 on August 23, 2013, and in CTA Case No. 8685 on October 30, 2013. 6 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-a". 7 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-5". 8 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-b". 9 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-c". 10 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-6". 11 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-d". t] Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-e". 13 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-7". 14 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-f". 15 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-4-g". 16 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-31". 17 Division Docket, Exhibit "P-8".

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 5 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION To respondent's mind, the four cases for refund/tax credit should not be given due course for failure of petitioner to exhaust administrative remedies before elevating its cases to the Court. Allegedly, petitioner failed to submit complete supporting documents at the administrative level as mandated in Section 112 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC), as amended, and Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 53-98. Further, to be entitled to refund, petitioner, who has the burden of proof, must prove compliance with all the requisites under existing law and jurisprudence including registration, invoicing and accounting requirements. After the parties submitted their Joint Stipulation of Facts and Issues, the Court issued the Pre-Trial Order on December 10, 2013. To prove its case, petitioner presented as witnesses: (1) Rachel M. Concepcion; and (2) Katherine 0. Constantino, the Court-commissioned Independent Certified Public Accountant (ICPA). Rachel M. Concepcion, the Finance Controller of petitioner testified that she is familiar with the instant cases since she oversees, prepares and safekeeps petitioner's financial documents pertaining to its operations. Petitioner is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and is licensed to operate as a Regional Operating Headquarters (ROHQ) in the country. Petitioner is likewise registered with the BIR with Certificate of Registration OCN No. 9RC0000270209 dated June 16, 2005. As a ROHQ, petitioner provides accounting, valuation and information systems maintenance and development services, among others, to entities in the Deutsche Bank Group. Thus, petitioner renders zero-rated services to its non- resident affiliates engaged in business outside the L

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. vs.CIR/ Page 6 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Philippines or nonresident persons not engaged in business who are outside the Philippines based on Section 108(8)(2) of the NIRC. For services rendered, it is paid in acceptable foreign currency, i.e. Euros, inwardly remitted through Deutsche Bank Manila then credited to petitioner's account in said bank. Thus, petitioner incurred input VAT for domestic purchases of goods (other than capital goods) and services, purchases of capital goods, and purchases of services rendered by nonresidents attributable to zero-rated sale of services in the year 2011, based on Section llO(B) and Section 112(A) of the NIRC. The input VAT incurred by petitioner remained unutilized since it was not applied against any output VAT liability. Due to the inaction of respondent on petitioner's administrative claims for refund, petitioner filed four (4) separate administrative claims for refund of its unutilized input VAT for the year 2011 on October 31, 2012, January 9, 2013, January 23, 2013, and March 19, 2013. The Court-commissioned !CPA Katherine 0. Constantino testified that she examined and verified the documentary evidence of petitioner in relation to the present cases. Thereafter, she prepared an ICPA Report which she submitted to the Court on May 29, 2014, indicating that of the pro-rated amount of input VAT attributable to petitioner's zero-rated sales of P158,201,143.71, only P62,454,876.86 was properly substantiated. She also examined the additional documents submitted by petitioner and submitted to the Court a supplemental report. After petitioner rested, respondent manifested that he would not present any evidence in the absence of the investigation report from the BIR examiners. At the instance of petitioner, the cases were reopened for the recall of witness Rachel M. Concepcion, who identified additional documents to prove that petitioner rendered services to non-

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 7 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION resident clients who are doing business outside the Philippines. In the Resolution dated August 5, 2016, the cases were submitted for decision" The Third Division of this Court rendered the assailed Decision dated August 4, 2017, which partially granted petitioner's claim for refund but in the reduced amount of P17,188,625.90, representing its unutilized and excess input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales for the four quarters of CY 2011. Aggrieved, both parties filed their respective Motions for Reconsideration therefrom. Also, petitioner filed a Motion to Reopen Trial. All motions were denied by the Third Division on December 15, 2017 for lack of merit. Hence, these Petitions for Review were filed. We rule to DENY the Petitions. In the instant petitions, Deutsche argues that it was able to prove that its sales to its non-resident foreign clients are all zero-rated. Therefore, all its input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales may be the proper subject of a claim for refund. On the other hand, the CIR insists that Deutsche is not entitled to the claim for refund. We do not agree with both petitioners' contention. In this regard, it bears stressing that the question of whether the evidence submitted by a party is sufficient to warrant the grant of a claim for refund lies within the sound discretion and judgment of the Court. 18 Thus, it is the claimant's burden to prove the factual basis of a claim for refund or tax credit. 19 A cursory examination of the evidence presented before the Court in Division will show that not all of Deutsche's sales declared as "Zero Rated Sales/Receipts" in its Quarterly VAT Returns for the four quarters of taxable year 2011 qualify for VAT zero-rating. 18 Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. CE Luzon Geothermal Pawer Company, Inc., CTA EB No. 474, September 1, 2009; Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Toledo Pawer Company, CTA EB No. 589, September 15, 2010; Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. San Roque Power Corporation, CTA EB No. 657, April 4, 2012. 19 Eastern Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 183531, March 25, 2015. L

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 8 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Deutsche's claim is anchored on Section 108(B)(2) in relation to Sections 110(B) and 112(A) and (C) of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997, as amended, which state: "SEC. 108. Value-added Tax on Sale of Services and Use or Lease of Properties. - XXX XXX XXX (B) Transactions Subject to Zero Percent (0%) Rate.- The following services performed in the Philippines by VAT-registered persons shall be subject to zero percent (0%) rate: (1) Processing, manufacturing or repacking goods for other persons doing business outside the Philippines which goods are subsequently exported, where the services are paid for in acceptable foreign currency and accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP); (2) Services other than those mentioned in the preceding paragraph rendered to a person engaged in business conducted outside the Philippines or to a nonresident person not engaged in business who is outside the Philippines when the services are performed, the consideration for which is paid for in acceptable foreign currency and accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP); SEC. 110. Tax Credits. - XXX XXX XXX (B) Excess Output or Input Tax. - If at the end of any taxable quarter the output tax exceeds the input tax, the excess shall be paid by the VAT-registered person. If the input tax exceeds the output tax, the excess shall be

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. vs.CIR/ Page 9 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION carried over to the succeeding quarter or quarters: xxx Provided, however, That any input tax attributable to zero-rated sales by a VAT- registered person may at his option be refunded or credited against other internal revenue taxes, subject to the provisions of Section 112. SEC. 112. Refunds or Tax Credits of Input Tax. - (A) Zero-Rated or Effectively Zero-Rated Sales. - Any VAT-registered person, whose sales are zero-rated or effectively zero-rated may, within two (2) years after the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made, apply for the issuance of a tax credit certificate or refund of creditable input tax due or paid attributable to such sales, except transitional input tax, to the extent that such input tax has not been applied against output tax: Provided, however, That in the case of zero-rated sales under Section 106(A)(2)(a)(1), (2) and (b) and Section 108{B)(1) and (2), the acceptable foreign currency exchange proceeds thereof had been duly accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP): Provided, further, That where the taxpayer is engaged in zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sale and also in taxable or exempt sale of goods of properties or services, and the amount of creditable input tax due or paid cannot be directly and entirely attributed to any one of the transactions, it shall be allocated proportionately on the basis of the volume of sales: Provided, finally, That for a person making sales that are zero-rated under Section 108{8){6), the input taxes shall be allocated ratably between his zero-rated and non-zero- rated sales. XXX XXX XXX (C) Period within which Refund or Tax Credit of Input Taxes shall be Made. - In proper cases, the Commissioner shall grant a refund or issue the tax credit certificate for creditable input taxes L

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 10 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission of complete documents in support of the application filed in accordance with Subsection (A) hereof. In case of full or partial denial of the claim for tax refund or tax credit, or the failure on the part of the Commissioner to act on the application within the period prescribed above, the taxpayer affected may, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the decision denying the claim or after the expiration of the one hundred twenty day- period, appeal the decision or the unacted claim with the Court of Tax Appeals." In sum, to be entitled to a tax credit or refund of excess input VAT attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales, the following requisites must be satisfied: 1. That the taxpayer is VAT-registered; 2. That the claim for refund was filed within the prescriptive periods; 3. That there must be zero-rated or effectively zero- rated sales; 4. That input taxes were incurred or paid; 5. That such input taxes are attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; and 6. That the input taxes were not applied against any output VAT liability Considering that there is no dispute as to the first (1st) and second (2nd) requisites, the Court deems it necessary to proceed and determine compliance with the remaining requisites. Based on the foregoing prov1s1ons, in order to subject a sale of service transaction to 0% VAT rate, it is required, inter alia, that the services were "rendered to a person

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 11 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION engaged in business outside the Philippines or to a non-resident person not engaged in business who is outside the Philippines when the services are performed" and the consideration therefor was "paid for in acceptable foreign currency and accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas CBSPl ". Under the premises, services covered by Section 108(8)(1) and (2) are in the nature of export sales since the payor-recipient of services is doing business outside the Philippines. Accordingly, under 8SP rules, the proceeds of export sales must be reported to the 8SP. Hence, there is reason to require the provider of services under Section 108(8)(1) and (2) to account for the foreign currency proceeds to the 8SP. The same justification does not apply if the provider and recipient of the services are both doing business in the Philippines since their transaction is not in the nature of an export sale even if payment is denominated in foreign currency. Further, when the provider and recipient of services are both doing business in the Philippines, their transaction falls squarely under Section 108(A) governing domestic sale or exchange of services. Indeed, this is a purely local sale or exchange of services subject to the regular VAT, unless of course the transaction falls under the other provision of Section 108(8).20 In the case of Accenture, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue/ 1 the Supreme Court held in this wise: "The evidence presented by Accenture may have established that its clients are foreign. This fact does not automatically mean, however, that these clients were doing business outside the Philippines. After all, the Tax Code itself has provisions for a foreign corporation engaged in business within the Philippines and vice versa, to wit: 'SEC. 22. Definitions- When used in this Title: �2 Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Burmeister and Wain Scandinavian Contractor Mindanao, Inc., G.R. No. 153205, January 22, 2007. 21 Accenture, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, GR. No. 190102, July 11, 2012.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 12 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION XXX XXX XXX (H) The term 'resident foreign corporation' applies to a foreign corporation engaged in trade or business within the Philippines. Cll The term 'nonresident foreign corporation' applies to a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business within the Philippines.' (Emphasis in the original) Consequently, to come within the purview of Section 108(8)(2), it is not enough that the recipient of the service be proven to be a foreign corporation; rather. it must be specifically oroven to be a nonresident foreign corporation. There is no specific criterion as to what constitutes 'doing' or 'engaging in' or 'transacting' business. We rule thus in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. British Overseas Airways Corporation: 22 'x x x. There is no specific criterion as to what constitutes 'doing' or 'engaging in' or 'transacting' business. Each case must be judged in the light of its peculiar environmental circumstances. The term implies a continuity of commercial dealings and arrangements, and contemplates, to that extent, the performance of acts or works or the exercise of some of the functions normally incident to, and in progressive prosecution of commercial gain or for the purpose and object of the business organization. 'In order that a foreign corporation may be regarded as doing business within a State, there must be continuity of conduct and intention to 22 Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. British Overseas Airways Corporation, G.R. No. L-65773-74, April 30, 1987. t

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 13 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION establish a continuous business, such as the appointment of a local agent, and not one of a temporary character. (Emphases and underscoring supplied)" Simply stated, it is not enough that the recipient of the service be shown to be a foreign corporation, it must likewise be established that the said recipient is a "nonresident foreign corporation". Relative thereto, the Court in Division explained that the service-recipient must also be not doing business in the Philippines. Otherwise, the transaction will be subject to the VAT at the then rate of 10%,23 and not at the 0% VAT rate. As correctly cited by the Court in Division, We reiterate the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Burmeister and Wain Scandinavian Contractor Mindanao, Inc, which reads as follows: "In this case, the payer-recipient of respondent's services is the Consortium which is a joint-venture doing business in the Philippines. While the Consortium's principal members are non-resident foreign corporations, the Consortium itself is doing business in the Philippines. This is shown clearly in BIR Ruling No. 023-95 which states that the contract between the Consortium and NAPOCOR is for a 15-year term, thus: 'This refers to your letter dated January 14, 1994 requesting for a clarification of the tax implications of a contract between a consortium composed of Burmeister & Wain Scandinavian Contractor NS ('BWSC'), Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding, Ltd. (MES), and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. ('MITSUI'), all referred to hereinafter as the 'Consortium', and the National Power Corporation ('NAPOCOR') for the operation and maintenance of two 100- Megawatt power barges ('Power Barges') acquired by NAPOCOR for a 15-year term. (Emphasis supplied) 23 Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 7-2006 dated January 31,2006 amended the VAT Rate to 12%.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 14 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Considering this length of time, the Consortium's operation and maintenance of NAPOCOR's power barges cannot be classified as a single or isolated transaction. The Consortium does not fall under Section 102(b)(2) which requires that the recipient of the services must be a person doing business outside the Philippines. Therefore, respondent's services to the Consortium, not being supplied to a person doing business outside the Philippines, cannot legally qualify for 0% VAT." (Underscoring supplied) We agree with the Court in Division that to be considered as a non-resident foreign corporation doing business outside the Philippines, each entity must be supported, at the very least, by BOTH a Certificate of Non- registration of Corporation/ Partnership issued by the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) AND Certificate/Articles of Foreign Incorporation/ Association. These documents are necessary for the following reasons: 1. The SEC's negative certification establishes that the recipient of the service has no registered business in the Philippines; and 2. The Certificate/ Articles of incorporation/ Association will prove that the recipient is indeed foreign. Applying the foregoing in the case at bar, while the Intra Group Service Agreements show the names of Deutsche's customers to whom it rendered services, nevertheless, it does not establish that such service recipients are non- resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines. Pursuant to Section 108(8)(2) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, only the sales of service by Deutsche to entities which have the said two (2) required documents will be treated as subject to the 0% VAT rate.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 15 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION In the same vein, the Court is not convinced that the AMinet database/4 offered as evidence, are sufficient to establish the fact that the service recipients are non-resident foreign corporations doing business outside the Philippines. Following the above disquisitions, only the amount of 28,324,387.08 or its peso equivalent, P1,691,367,779.99 of Deutsche's sales of services for the four quarters of 2011, would qualify for VAT zero-rating under Section 108(B)(2) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, computed as follows 25 : Customer's Name O.R. Date O.R. OR OR Amount Amount in Peso No. Exhibit (in Euro) Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd 12-Jan-11 1176 No. 8 742.50 498 916.99 Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd 24-Jan-11 1208 P-51 8 742.50 528 279.55 6-Aor-11 1387 P-79 38 467.07 2 369 559.97 Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdinos Pte Ltd 7-Jul-11 1578 P-250 38 467.08 2 360 305.41 4-0ct-11 1708 P-419 64 216.80 3 759 125.80 Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdinos Pte Ltd 5-Jan-11 1164 P-540 86 210.13 5 017 731.30 12-Jan-11 1178 P-40 70 855.00 4 075 367.04 Deutsche Asia Pacific Holdinos Pte Ltd 12-Jan-11 1179 P-53 34 640.00 1 992 388.88 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 12-Jan-11 1180 P-54 16 140.00 928 324.38 Head Office 12-Jan-11 1181 P-55 13 784.25 792 828.71 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 12-Jan-11 1182 P-56 18 157.50 1 044 364.93 Head Office 12-Jan-11 1183 P-57 8 847.41 508 876.48 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 12-Jan-11 1184 P-58 8 070.00 464 162.19 Head Office 7-Feb-11 1246 P-59 8 733.74 518 247.90 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 7-Feb-11 1247 P-114 8 742.50 518 767.71 Head Office 7-Feb-11 1248 P-115 18 157.50 1 077 440.63 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 7-Feb-11 1249 P-116 106 039.80 6 292 253.28 Head Office 9-Feb-11 1261 P-117 347 187.05 20 608 606.66 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 3-Mar-11 1293 P-128 731 092.86 44 139 512.09 Head Office 3-Mar-11 1294 P-157 344 808.75 20 817 724.84 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 3-Mar-11 1295 P-158 29 988.26 1 810 532.20 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1321 P-159 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1322 P-184 319.94 19 199.92 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1323 P-185 26 900.00 1 614 295.90 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1324 P-186 103 349.80 6 202 124.85 Head Office P-187 16 140.00 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 968 577.54 Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office 24 Division Docket, Exhibits "P-13", "P-6065" to "P-6112" and "P-6170" to "P-6171". 25 Table of Computation of Petitioner's sales of services for CY 2011 qualified for VAT Zero-rating, En Bane Docket, pp. 67-71.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 16 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1325 P-188 26 900.00 1 614 295.90 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1326 P-189 8 070.00 484 288.77 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1327 P-190 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1328 P-191 96 581.41 5 795 947.00 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1329 P-192 8 847.41 530 941.92 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1330 P-193 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1331 P-194 18 157.50 1 089 649.73 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1332 P-195 3 257.59 195 491.23 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1333 P-196 968 577.54 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1334 P-197 16 140.00 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1336 P-199 35 104.59 2106661.55 Head Office 11-Mar-11 1337 P-200 377 950.48 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 11-Mar-11 1338 P-201 6 298.02 Head Office 4-Apr-11 1382 P-245 31 204.08 1 872 588.04 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 14-Apr-11 1401 P-262 262 500.21 15 752 900.10 Head Office 9-May-11 1459 P-310 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 9-May-11 1460 P-311 9 153.11 549 287.28 Head Office 9-May-11 1461 P-312 209 180.30 12 553 118.98 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 9-Mav-11 1462 P-313 Head Office 9-Mav-11 1463 P-314 13 903.53 852 817.50 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 9-May-11 1464 P-315 766 230.31 48 046 394.97 Head Office 9-May-11 1465 P-316 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 2-Jun-11 1507 P-353 27 081.03 1 658 664.34 Head Office 2-lun-11 1508 P-354 12 976.22 794 770.12 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 2-Jun-11 1509 P-355 23 672.04 Head Office 10-lun-11 1526 P-366 13 778.06 1 449 869.84 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 5-Jul-11 1576 P-417 152 566.30 843 881.37 Head Office 2-Seo-11 1653 P-482 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 2-Seo-11 1654 P-483 4 777.81 9 344 411.26 Head Office 2-Sep-11 1655 P-484 744 023.10 292 632.26 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 2-Sep-11 1656 P-485 Head Office 2-Sep-11 1657 P-486 12 976.22 45 570 075.63 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 6-Seo-11 1668 P-497 17 754.03 807 316.82 Head Office 20-Seo-11 1682 P-510 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 20-Seo-11 1683 P-511 4 777.81 1 104 568.75 Head Office 20-Sep-11 1684 P-512 21 731.19 297 251.93 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 20-Sep-11 1685 P-513 17 530.57 Head Office 20-Sep-11 1686 P-514 1 364 464.48 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 20-Sep-11 1687 P-515 4 777.81 1 091 667.16 Head Office 12 976.22 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 148 620.96 286 037.45 Head Office 17 754.03 776 859.04 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8 897 624.77 Head Office 8 346.59 1 062 896.49 131 616.75 499 692.82 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 737 573.83 7 835 526.82 Head Office 695 023.94 43 968 251.15 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 541 450.26 41 431 767.11 Head Office 632 036.99 32 276 932.90 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 37 676 989.05 Head Office 8 696.54 518 179.69 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Asia Pacific

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 17 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Head Office 18-0ct-11 1737 P-566 11,670.84 695,722.11 18-0ct-11 1740 P-569 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1743 P-572 152 566.30 9 053 177.14 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1746 P-575 26 542.11 1 574 990.17 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1747 P-576 23 672.04 1 404 682.24 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1748 P-577 20 763.12 1 232 068.97 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1749 P-578 8 226.05 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1750 P-579 6 473.94 488 128.03 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1751 P-580 20 713.04 384 159.05 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1752 P-581 23 672.04 1 229 097.25 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1754 P-583 23 672.04 1 404 682.24 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1755 P-584 3 195.73 1 404 682.24 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1756 P-585 4 429.53 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1757 P-586 25 628.58 3 195.73 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1758 P-587 19 819.31 262 845.20 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1760 P-589 12 908.50 1 520 781.95 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1761 P-590 1 176 063.94 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1762 P-591 141 673.23 765 981.33 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-0ct-11 1763 P-592 152 566.30 8 406 790.01 Head Office 18-0ct-11 1765 P-594 9 053 177.14 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8-Nov-11 1815 P-631 21 502.09 1 275 918.93 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1816 P-632 4 777.81 283 511.89 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8-Nov-11 1817 P-633 1 490 315.37 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1818 P-634 25 115.15 208 595.43 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8-Nov-11 1819 P-635 3 515.30 1 715 019.62 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1820 P-636 18 263 506.07 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8-Nov-11 1821 P-637 29 074.77 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1822 P-638 309 621.67 7 449.41 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8-Nov-11 1823 P-639 254 371.72 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1824 P-640 126.29 1 125 413.33 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 8-Nov-11 1825 P-641 4 312.37 1 511 740.85 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1826 P-642 19079.16 485 226.10 18-Nov-11 1855 P-669 25 628.58 1 481 455.40 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 18-Nov-11 1857 P-671 8 226.05 743 877.28 Head Office 18-Nov-11 1858 P-672 25 115.15 127 531.81 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 9-Dec-11 1893 P-703 12 610.97 8 356 811.38 Head Office 14-Dec-11 1928 P-736 2 162.05 761 427.55 14-Dec-11 1929 P-737 141 673.23 7 289 840.63 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 12 908.50 58 755 587.49 Head Office 123 970.09 184 823.41 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 1 001 938.81 180 934.99 Head Office 3 151.73 966 245.44 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 3 140.08 969 721.12 Head Office 16 824.66 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 16 885.18 Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific Head Office

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 18 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 14-Dec-11 1930 P-738 145 395.12 8 350 086.81 Head Office 14-Dec-11 1931 P-739 30 320.33 1 741 305.95 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 14-Dec-11 1932 P-740 18 105.83 1 039 823.43 Head Office 14-Dec-11 1933 P-741 27 617.38 1 586 074.69 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 14-Dec-11 1934 P-742 14 691 145.95 Head Office 14-Dec-11 1935 P-743 255 808.23 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 14-Dec-11 1936 P-744 8 325.06 478 110.78 Head Office 8-Nov-11 1814 P-781 8 489.36 487 546.58 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 7-Jan-11 1166 P-231 7 503.79 442 622.49 Head Office 9-Feb-11 1255 P-122 953 237.01 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 9-Feb-11 1256 P-123 16 650.05 946 300.36 Head Office 9-Feb-11 1258 P-125 15 942.04 287 415.31 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 9-Feb-11 1254 P-232 159 675.17 Head Office 12-Dec-11 1897 P-705 4 842.00 988 326.99 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Asia Pacific 12-Dec-11 1898 P-706 2 690.00 476 198.03 Head Office 12-Dec-11 1899 P-707 16 650.05 473 356.35 12-Dec-11 1900 P-708 8 164.33 414 213.71 Deutsche Bank Aktienaesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 12-Dec-11 1901 P-709 8 115.61 546 008.61 13-Dec-11 1902 P-710 7 101.62 282 417.64 Deutsche Bank Aktienaesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 13-Dec-11 1903 P-711 9 361.22 414 213.13 13-Dec-11 1904 P-712 4 842.00 414 213.13 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 13-Dec-11 1905 P-713 7 101.61 473 356.35 10-Jan-11 1172 P-47 7 101.61 414 213.13 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 20-Jan-11 1195 P-67 8 115.61 25 327 060.55 24-Jan-11 1209 P-80 7 101.61 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 18-Feb-11 1276 P-141 441 832.23 73 407.16 3-Mar-11 1298 P-162 1 228.87 8 785 632.45 Deutsche Bank Aktienaesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 7-Apr-11 1389 P-252 145 393.46 5-Mav-11 1440 P-293 6 610.27 389 578.91 Deutsche Bank Aktienaesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 15-Jun-11 1531 P-371 1 464 237.13 88 402 877.45 24-Jun-11 1547 P-384 7 479.53 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 1570 P-414 9 524.43 460 722.59 4-Jul-11 1637 P-468 1 091 949.00 607 697.68 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 23-Aug-11 1650 P-479 30 254.52 68 422 725,'!!3_ 2-Seo-11 1694 P-521 1 339 442.14 1 861 158.23 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 23-Seo-11 1696 P-523 31 083.38 83 751 566.58 26-Sep-11 1783 P-608 1 920 418.99 1 899 514.67 Deutsche Bank Aktienaesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 25-0ct-11 1801 P-623 62 916.13 115 602 885.81 2-Nov-11 1875 P-688 689 090.12 3 709 566.48 Deutsche Bank Aktienaesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 24-Nov-11 1883 P-694 1 071 419.83 40 598 279.84 28-Nov-11 1948 P-756 629 013.40 64 377,412.23 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 16-Dec-11 1963 P-767 3 335.04 36 676,676"~ 20-Dec-11 626 365.95 193 988.60 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Jakarta 621 062.04 36 513 078.54 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New 1 047 662.31 35 602 282.69 York 60 013 512.49 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Filiale New York

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 19 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION Deutsche Securities Inc. 10-Feb-11 1265 P-132 2 367 688.53 141 384 626.42 Deutsche Securities Inc. 18-Feb-11 1278 P-143 713 521.06 42 051 649.08 Deutsche Securities Inc. 15-Apr-11 1409 P-270 358 026.33 22 376 645.63 Deutsche Securities Inc. 12-Sep-11 1671 P-500 516 744.23 30 131 614.42 Deutsche Securities Inc. 12-Dec-11 1906 P-714 Deutsche Securities Inc. 11-lul-11 1581 P-422 1 870 536.33 109 102 119.70 TOTAL VAUD ZERO-RATED SALES 481 808.18 28 923 330.49 28 324 387.08 1 691 367 779.99 We proceed. Deutsche likewise questions the disallowances made by the Court in Division in the total amount of P73,793,995.98, broken down as follows26 : Reference (Annex Original Amount Supplemental TOTAL 9 of ICPA (Exhibit P-29) Amount (Exhibit P- Reports) 6172) OTHER FINDINGS - Purchases of Goods 1 Purchases of goods supported by TIN VAT REG invoices but not dated 4Q-e p 124,347.80 p 124,347.80 within the quarter of claim and without BIR permit to orint 2 Purchases of goods supported by REG VAT TIN invoices but not dated 1Q-f; 2Q-f 4,144.98 4,144.98 within the year of claim and/or petitioner's TIN is not indicated 3 Purchases of goods supported by VAT REG TIN invoices but date is not clearly visible, without 1Q-g; 4Q-g 5,364.10 5,364.10 petitioner's TIN and VAT amount is not shown seoaratelv 4 Purchases of goods supported by VAT REG TIN invoices but not dated within the year of claim, 1Q-h; 2Q-h; 3Q-h; 500,588.39 p 189,417.16 690,005.55 and/or without petitioner's 4Q-h 3,351.26 TIN and/or incorrect 2,362.50 825.00 petitioner's TIN and/or VAT amount is not shown separately 5 Purchases of goods supported by VAT REG TIN invoices but no date 1Q-I; 3Q-I; 4Q-i 3,158.40 192.86 2,362.50 indicated and without 825.00 petitioner's TIN 6 Purchases of goods supported by VAT REG TIN invoices but date is written 3Q-j on a computer generated invoice and petitioner's TIN is not indicated 7 Purchases of goods supported by VAT REG TIN invoices but amount per OR 2Q-k is not tie-up with the amount per schedule 26 Table of Computation of Petitioner's input VAT for CY 2011 without proper substantiation of VAT receipts or official receipts, En Bane Docket, pp. 72-77. t..

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 20 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION 8 Purchases of goods 2Q-1; 4Q-I 58,007.15 58,007.15 supported by VAT REG TIN 3Q-m27 6,029.83 6,029.83 invoices without BIR Permit to Print and/or orintina date 1Q-n; 2Q-n; 3Q-n 63,866.32 63,866.32 15,953.22 9 Purchases of goods 1Q-o 15,953.22 24,812.15 suooorted by TIN invoices 1Q-p; 3Q-p 319,313.37 48,882.06 24,812.15 1Q-q; 2Q-q; 4Q-q 3,294.76 368,195.43 10 Purchases of goods 1Q-bu; 3Q-bu 3,294.76 supported by TIN VAT 1Q-bv; 3Q-bv; 4Q- invoices but not dated 169,007.81 169,007.81 within the year of claim bv and/or without petitioner's 2Q-r; 3Q-r; 4Q-r 936,422.44 (817,898.61) 118,523.83 TIN ,. 2 065 J 95.65 ,. (407 J03.96) ,. J 658 09J.69 11 Purchases of goods - supported by TIN VAT invoices with incorrect petitioner's TIN 12 Purchases of goods supported by TIN VAT invoices with incorrect petitioner's TIN and/or VAT amount is not tie-up with the amount oer schedule 13 Purchases of goods supported by documents other than VAT invoices 14 Purchases of goods supported by REG VAT TIN invoices where petitioner's TIN is not indicated 15 Purchases of goods supported by TIN VAT invoices but petitioner's TIN is not indicated and VAT amount is not shown seoarately 16 Purchases of goods supported by photocopied invoices Sub-total OTHER FINDINGS - Purchases of Services 1 Purchases of services p p supported by BIR TIN ORs 2Q-w 26,756.57 26,756.57 with no BIR permit to print 2 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG ORs 1Q-x; 3Q-x 27,487.02 p 1,019.60 28,506.62 but VAT amount is not shown separately 3 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG ORs but not dated within the quarter of claim with 3Q-y 33.60 33.60 incorrect petitioner's TIN and VAT amount is not tied-up with the amount oer schedule 4 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG ORs with incorrect petitioner's 1Q-z 1,982.20 1,982.20 TIN and VAT amount is not 40,793.14 40,793.14 273,908.52 273,908.52 tied-up with the amount per schedule 5 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG ORs with incorrect petitioner's 1Q-aa; 2Q-aa; 3Q- TIN and VAT amount is not aa tied-up with the amount per schedule 6 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN VAT ORs without 1Q-ab petitioner's TIN and VAT amount is not shown separately 27 The annex referred to cannot actually be found.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 21 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION 7 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but not dated within 1Q-ac; 2Q-ac; 3Q- 488,515.17 488,515.17 the quarter of claim and/or ac petitioner's TIN and/or VAT 3,756.70 amount is not shown 261,114.17 2,565,815.39 separately 58,134.59 8 Purchases of services 9,076.28 2,090.98 supported by VAT REG TIN 182.04 DRs but not dated within 11,523,808.61 280,752.84 the quarter of claim and 3Q-ad 3,756.70 incorrect petitioner's TIN 3,768,597.09 78,019.20 and VAT amount per OR is 2,225,215.82 not tied-up with the amount per schedule 9 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but not dated within 1Q-ae; 2Q-ae; 3Q- 261,114.17 the quarter of claim and ae; 4Q-ae VAT amount per OR is not tied-up with the amount per schedule 10 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN 4Q-af 167,658.21 2, 733,473.60 DRs but not dated within the vear of claim 11 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but no date indicated 1Q-ag; 4Q-ag 58,134.59 and/or without petitioner's TIN 12 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but no date indicated and with incorrect 1Q-ah 9,076.28 petitioner's TIN and VAT amount per OR is not tied- up with the amount per schedule 13 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but no date indicated 2Q-ai 2,090.98 and VAT amount per OR is not tied-up with the amount per schedule 14 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN 2Q-aj 182.04 DRs but no year indicated in the date 15 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN ORs but without petitioner's 1Q-ak; 2Q-ak; 3Q- 4,403,506.66 15,927,315.27 TIN and/or incorrect ak; 4Q-ak petitioner's TIN and/or VAT not shown separately 16 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs without petitioner's 1Q-al; 2Q-al; 3Q-al; 280,752.84 TIN and VAT amount is not 4Q-al tied-up with the amount per schedule 17 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but incorrect 1Q-am; 2Q-am; 3Q- am petitioner's TIN and VAT 3,768,597.09 amount per OR is not tied- up with the amount per schedule 18 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN DRs but without 3Q-an 78,019.20 2,225,215.82 countersignature on the alteration in the petitioner's TIN 19 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN 1Q-ap; 2Q-ap; 3Q- DRs but VAT amount per ap; 4Q-ap OR is not tied-up with the amount per schedule

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 22 of 31 CJR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION 20 Purchases of services supported by TIN ORs 1Q-aq; 3Q-aq; 4Q- 117,843.23 44,536.85 162,380.08 without petitioner's TIN and aq 32,350.37 32,350.37 VAT amount is not shown 28,382.14 28,382.14 85,146.42 separately 147,102.74 21 Purchases of services 1Q-ar 361.750.33 supported bv TIN ORs 19,529.67 22 Purchases of services 41,344.20 2,563, 712.39 supported by TIN ORs but 483,858.45 132,252.83 incorrect petitioner's TIN 1Q-as 18,543.75 and VAT amount per OR is 32,749.82 1,011,678.34 not tied-up with the 238,504.92 amount per schedule 23 Purchases of services supported by TIN ORs but VAT amount per OR is not 1Q-at; 2Q-at; 4Q-at 85,146.42 147,102.74 tied-up with the amount per schedule 24 Purchases of services supported by TIN NON VAT 1Q-au; 2Q-au; 4Q- and/or NON VAT REG TIN au ORs and/or TIN VAT ZERO RATED 25 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but not dated in the quarter 1Q-av; 2Q-av; 3Q- 361,750.33 of claim and/or without av petitioner's TIN and/or VAT not shown seoaratelv 26 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but not dated in the quarter 2Q-aw; 3Q-aw 19,529.67 of claim and VAT amount is not tied-up with the amount per schedule 27 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but not dated in the year of 1Q-ax; 4Q-ax 1,712.68 43,056.88 the claim and/or VAT amount is not shown separately 28 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but without petitioner's TIN 1Q-ay; 2Q-ay; 3Q- 4,650,934.98 7,214,647.37 or incorrect petitioner's TIN ay; 4Q-ay and/or VAT amount is not shown separately_ 29 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but without petitioner's TIN 1Q-az; 2Q-az; 4Q- 483,858.45 and VAT amount is not az tied-up with the amount per schedule 30 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but incorrect petitioner's 1Q-ba 132,252.83 TIN and VAT amount is not tied-up with the amount per schedule 31 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but without 3Q-bb 18,543.75 countersignature on the alteration in the petitioner's TIN 32 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but without BIR permit to 2Q-bc 32,749.82 print and VAT amount is not tied-up with the amount oer schedule 33 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs 1Q-bd; 2Q-bd; 3Q- 1,011,678.34 but VAT amount is not tied- bd; 4Q-bd 336,103.62 up with the amount per schedule 34 Purchases of services 1Q-be; 2Q-be; 3Q- 97,598.70 supported by tape receipts be L

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 23 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION 35 Purchases of services 1Q-bf; 2Q-bf; 3Q- 2,722,422.65 701,738.73 3,424,161.38 supported by other than OR bf; 4Q-bf 47,754,185.11 (27 ,122,791. 74) 20,631,393.37 36 Purchases of services 1Q-bg; 2Q-bg; 3Q- supported by photocopied bg; 4Q-bg OR 37 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN ORs but no date indicated 4Q-bw 27,540.00 27,540.00 4Q-bx 7,170.00 7,170.00 and/or VAT amount is not 3Q-by; 4Q-by 2,829.75 2,829.75 3Q-bz; 4Q-bz shown separatelv 224,318.09 224,318.09 3Q-ca 38 Purchases of services 1Q-bt; 2Q-bt; 3Q- supported by NON VAT REG bt; 4Q-bt TIN ORs and VAT amount is not shown separately 39 Purchases of services supported by TIN NON VAT ORs and VAT amount is not shown separately 40 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ORs but no date indicated and VAT amount is not shown separately 41 Purchases of services supported by TIN VAT ZERO Rated ORs and VAT 24,130.00 24,130.00 amount is not shown separately 42 Purchases of services supported by VAT REG TIN ORs/TIN VAT ORs 348,115.17 348,115.17 representing overstated VAT amount Sub-total t>77 427 397.29 t>(l6 4l9 982.32) t>6l 007 4l4.97 OTHER FINDINGS- Purchases of Capital Goods not - exceedi119 1'1 Million 1 Purchases of capital goods 1Q-bj p 72,581.79 p 72,581.79 not exceeding one million supported with TIN VAT invoices dated not within the_y_ear of claim 2 Purchases of capital goods 2Q-bk 1,500.00 1,500.00 not exceeding one million supported with TIN VAT invoices not dated within the auarter of claim 3 Purchases of capital goods 4Q-bl 9,000.00 9,000.00 not exceeding one million supported by VAT REG TIN (91,686.42) invoices not dated within the auarter of claim 177,070.37 4 Purchases of capital goods ,. l68,465.74 not exceeding one million 1Q-bm; 2Q-bm; 4Q- 10,960,023.58 (91,686.42) 1'90,621,082.26 supported by documents bm other than VAT invoices 5 Purchases of capital goods 1Q-bn; 2Q-bn; 4Q- 177,070.37 not exceeding one million bn supported by documents other than VAT invoices ,. - Sub-total l68,465.74 of services Purchases 10,960,023.58 without supporting documents GRAND TOTAL 1'(16,827,086.28) 1'73,793,995.98 Deutsche argues that the foregoing amount must not be disallowed based on the following grounds: 1. The input VAT claimed from these supporting documents may be readily computed;

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. vs.CIR/ Page 24 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION 2. These supporting documents were issued by Deutsche Knowledge's clients over which it had no participation and control whatsoever; and 3. Non-compliance with the invoicing requirements attracts the applicable administrative penalties, not the disallowance of the claim. This Court finds the foregoing arguments untenable. Statutes that grant tax exemptions are construed strictissimi juris against the taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing authority. It therefore bears emphasis that tax refunds in relation to the VAT are in the nature of tax exemptions. 28 Consequently, the taxpayer claiming the tax credit or refund has the burden of proving that he is entitled to the refund or credit, in this case input VAT, by submitting evidence that he has complied with the requirements laid down in the Tax Code and the BIR's revenue regulations under which such privilege of credit or refund is accorded. Clearly, an applicant for a claim for tax refund or tax credit must not only prove entitlement to the claim but also compliance with all the documentary and evidentiary requirements. 29 In the case at bar, Deutsche as a refund claimant for input VAT, it is mandatory under the law to show that the VAT invoices or official receipts issued to it by its suppliers, as the case may be, complied with Section 113(B)(2)(a) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, which provides as follows: "SEC. 113. Invoicing and Accounting Requirements for VAT-registered Persons. - XXX XXX XXX (B) Information Contained in the VAT Invoice or VAT Official Receipt. The following 28 Panasonic Communications Imaging Corporation of the Philippines vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 178090, February 8, 2010. 29 Eastern Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 183531, March 25,2015.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 25 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION information shall be indicated in the VAT invoice or VAT official receipt: (1) A statement that the seller is a VAT- registered person, followed by his Taxpayer's Identification Number (TIN); (2) The total amount which the purchaser pays or is obligated to pay to the seller with the indication that such amount includes the value- added tax: Provided, That: (a)The amount of the tax shall be shown as a separate item in the invoice or receipt; xxx." (Emphases supplied) Based on the foregoing, the VAT invoice or VAT official receipt, as the case may be, must state, inter alia, the amount of the tax as a separate item therein. Strict adherence to this requirement must be shown. On this note, if it is shown that the said VAT invoice or VAT official receipt does not indicate the said requirements, it must not be included as part of the taxpayer-claimant's refundable amount. Correspondingly, Deutsche's allegation that the input VAT claimed from the supporting documents may be readily computed has no leg to stand on, since the indication of the input VAT in the VAT invoice or VAT official receipt, as the case may be, is a mandatory legal requirement. Furthermore, the reasoning that the subject VAT invoices or official receipts were issued without its participation and control is specious. While it may be true that the said VAT invoices or official receipts were issued without its participation and control, it was incumbent upon Deutsche to require its suppliers of goods and services to issue the pertinent VAT invoice or official receipt, as the case may be, which bears all the information required by the NIRC and corresponding revenue regulations. In other words, having been charged with the burden to prove its claim for refund, Deutsche should have been

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 26 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION vigilant in ensuring that every purchase of goods or services is supported by a legally compliant VAT official receipt or invoice. Deutsche attempts to persuade this Court by arguing that by submitting to the Court-commissioned Independent Certified Public Accountant (ICPA) all documents supporting input VAT for the CY 2011, the ICPA could not have come up with his findings, unless he has examined the relevant VAT invoices supporting Deutsche's purchases of goods. In several pronouncements by this Court, We have repetitively stated that refund claims of input VAT must be supported by pertinent documents. Thus, Deutsche's claim that the denial of the amount P5,382,960.5530 constitutes as a double deduction of its allowable input VAT is without merit. A VAT-registered taxpayer is required to comply with all the VAT invoicing requirements to be able to file for a claim for input taxes on domestic purchases for goods or services attributable to zero-rated sales. 31 To reiterate, compliance with all the VAT invoicing requirements provided by tax laws and regulations is mandatory. 32 Under Sections 110(A)(1)(a) and (b), and 113(A) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, a creditable input VAT should be evidenced by a VAT invoice or official receipt. Said provisions read as follows: "SEC. 110. Tax Credits.- (A) Creditable Input Tax.- {1) Any input tax evidenced by a VAT invoice or official receipt issued in accordance with Section 113 hereof on the following transactions shall be creditable against the output tax: (a) Purchase or importation of goods: xxx 30 Table of Computation of Petitioner's input VAT for CY 2011 without the required VAT receipts or official receipts, En Bane Docket, pp. 77-81. 31 Microsoft Philippines, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 180173, April 6, 2011. 32 Supra, Note 20.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 27 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION (b) Purchase of services on which a value added tax has actually been paid." (Emphasis and underscoring supplied) "SEC. 113. Invoicing and Accounting Requirements for VAT-registered Persons. - (A) Invoicing Requirements. A VAT- registered person shall issue: (1) A VAT invoice for every sale. barter or exchange of goods or properties; and (3) A VAT official receipt for every lease of goods or properties, and for every sale, barter or exchange of services." Relative thereto, Section 4.11 0-8(a)(2), (4), and (d), of RR No. 16-2005 provides as follows: "SEC. 4.110-8. Substantiation of Input Tax Credits.- XXX XXX XXX (2) For the domestic purchase of goods and properties - invoice showing the information required under Sees. 113 and 237 of the Tax Code. XXX XXX XXX (4) For the purchase of services - official receipt showing the information required under Sees. 113 and 237 of the Tax Code. XXX XXX XXX (d) Input tax from payments made to non-residents (such as for services, rentals and royalties) shall be supported by a copy of the Monthly Remittance Return of Value Added Tax Withheld (BIR Form 1600) filed by the resident payor in behalf of the non- resident evidencing remittance of VAT due

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. vs.CIR/ Page 28 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION which was withheld by the payor." (Emphases and underscoring supplied) Clearly, under Sections llO(A) and 113(A) of the NIRC, any input tax that is subject of a claim for refund must be evidenced by a VAT invoice or official receipt. 33 Under the law, a VAT invoice is necessary for every sale, barter or exchange of goods or properties while a VAT official receipt properly pertains to every lease of goods or properties, and for every sale, barter or exchange of services. 34 With regard to refund of the input VAT from the payments made to non- residents, the above-quoted provision of RR No. 16-2005 requires that it must be substantiated by a copy of the subject Monthly Remittance Return of VAT Withheld (BIR Form 1600) filed by the refund claimant on behalf of the non-resident. Although the Court-commissioned ICPA is of the view that certain amounts of input VAT are refundable, despite not being supported or substantiated by the above-stated documents, the Court in Division is not bound by the findings of the ICPA. It must be emphasized that the said documents under Sections 110(A)(1)(a) and (b), and 113(A) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, in relation to Section 4.110-8 (a)(2), (4), and (d), of RR No. 16-2005, are subject to the Court's own thorough consideration and evaluation. Lastly, anent Deutsche's insistence that out-of-period claims should be allowed, in the view that said claims are specifically allowed under Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 42-03 35, the Court also disagrees. We submit that RMCs, such as RMC No. 42-03, are considered administrative rulings which are issued from time to time by the CIR; 36 and, that these administrative issuances have the force and effect of law, and benefit from the same presumption of validity and constitutionality 33 Taganito Mining Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 201195, November 26, 2014. 34 Kepco Philippines Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 181858, November 24, 2010. 35 REVENUE MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 42-2003: Clarifying Certain Issues Raised Relative to the Processing of Claims for Value-Added Tax (VAT) Credit/Refund, Including Those Filed with the Tax and Revenue Group, One-Stop Shop Inter-Agency Tax Credit and Duty Drawback Center, Department of Finance (OSS) by Direct Exporters, July 15, 2013. 36 Asia International Auctioneers, Inc., eta!. vs. Parayno, eta!., G.R. No. 163445, December 18, 2007.

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 29 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION enjoyed by statutesY However, it must be remembered that BIR circulars and rulings cannot prevail over the clear and plain language of the NIRC, as amended. 38 Even for the sake of argument that indeed RMC No. 42- 03 allows out-of-period claims of input VAT, the same cannot be adhered to, because it contravenes Section 110(2) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, which is one of the pertinent provisions applicable to Deutsche's claim for refund. Further, the afore-mentioned provision lays down the rules as to when the input VAT is creditable against the output VAT, to wit: "SEC. 110. Tax Credits.- XXX XXX XXX (2) The input tax on domestic purchases or importation of goods or properties by a VAT- registered person shall be creditable: (a) To the purchaser upon consummation of sale and on importation of goods or properties; and (b) To the importer uoon oavment of the value added tax prior to the release of the goods from the custody of the Bureau of Customs. xxx, That in case of purchase of services, lease or use of properties, the input tax shall be creditable to the purchaser, lessee or licensee upon payment of the compensation, rental, royalty or fee." (Emphases and underscoring supplied) The foregoing law is clear. As to the purchaser of goods or properties, the input VAT is creditable against the output VAT, upon consummation of the sale; as to the importer, upon payment of the VAT; and as to the purchaser of services, lease or use of properties, the input VAT therefor is creditable upon payment of the compensation, rental, royalty or fee. With the use of the word "upon", it can be 37 Chevron Phils, Inc. vs. Bases Conversion and Development Authority, et. al., G.R. No. 173863, September 15,2010. 38 Security Bank Corporation (formerly Security Bank and Trust Company) vs. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 130838, August 22, 2006. t

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 30 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION easily discerned from the said prov1s1ons that the creditability of the pertinent input VAT against the output VAT must be made as it happens, and not to be made at any other time. All told, no error was committed by the Court in Division in the assailed Decision and Resolution. Thus, there is no reason to disturb its findings. WHEREFORE, the petitions are DENIED. The Decision of the Third Division of this Court in CTA Case Nos. 8623, 8656, 8661 & 8685 dated 04 August 2017, and its Resolution dated 15 December 2017, are AFFIRMED. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED. Q4 N~ M~~- &~ WE CONCUR: CIELITO N. MINbARO-GRULLA Associate Justice ROMAN G. DE ROSARIO Presiding Justice ~~ C. G....t-.,._:ao4 I Q.. ERL~P.UY JiJA-NITO C. CASTANErfA, JR. Associate Justice Associate Justice � ABON-VICTORINO (On Leave) MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS LIBAN Associate Justice ~ 7: /k----''- CATHERINET.MANAHAN Associate Justice

Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD.vs.CIR/ Page 31 of 31 CIR vs. Deutsche Knowledge Services. PTE, LTD. CTA EB Nos. 1763 and 1764 DECISION CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 13 of the Constitution, it is hereby certified that the conclusions in the above Decision were reached in consultation before these cases were assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Court En Bane. Presiding Justice