CTA Case No. 1464 (Decision)
fU tC f'f { 'l j' (.II l uO - CJ1Y L .. . . -- . - ... .... .. ... .... .... ... ..... ..............�. tc c 157
- 2. � 1 0 � y yc 158
{ 1 .' 0 ... I . � ht:OU M- ni � ch toms of M t . . .o , 0.' td d � io 19: of th no "'0 l Ur:1 of ig t d u 1c [ �,f 2 . 1 .. h .:h c n nd 1 ld not h. e. b~ us-d n 1 i in h~ b ... .e, , d o.tr c~ c�' .OU, s s~ss. e 0 "l~ � 1 .. 3 b 1 t 59 '\
� t � v c0 160
... . 1. '7, � � ' 161
� � � � c � n 162
1 I 0 1 u 163
1 c0 lr f l t l h ... � n ", 'Jr,i<, 3 1 �i ~ .n e 1~ $ h ol 0 y) d 6 c ,.If
.. .. � l n � n -- - L --- �- 165
Jy ..,h uni o m t s,f ~ lliJ n ;, t ly 166
1- �2 c1 t �r 0 d n ,. �. � e 0"'' 1 67
� - � � , 168
l - 13 - l 0 i:h . t t 1 ;. 1. .� ~ ::\n 1 � b i o '�"' t tJ O.t i ry CD ,r - o hie s ur. in �h absC!'nce , ~o t e ccntr ry -� p n P �ov,l lo of iti na y b nk- , t::C ... ing :;.h 0 gh tir .... ati l.n ~ ' y .rk, n" b~E'!fl :Cl~bite-d e- conn of, or - ' ' p ........ fa.t ��. .., ~L.i�'n .r ::-n.... l~;*i r'!"Jwr u on y ~� � ,cj it. f 'li\c� u .. ~ .. by .. 0 d p n t in fi ::linci g �.he V � '-' t delL- co,. s nd io �c h ':)hi i r::itt of he ~1 c ic 1 ;.~CC sn.titf"' ;)00 for u: construe !C. i () r� . ' d�-�' s ,.,o:.. r n ~- rY o. of such ~ur c ASt ~n c � ��zia lo to ti�'on~x in . he hili� in '"'urn must f. ve c:r: cli tnd ��h . ;-.ceo n vf t ~ Y �� c s � - of ooo . nk i n N w Yo.rk. - rl .v ry, l g 1 irr" ts o_ . � ~ oqu � .1. n 169
c ) s 17 0
- :J .. � ( y � i ( 7 ) � .- t - n �� 171
1- � Order v � 1 ;--J') I tw
' ,. ,J� �� ~ -, i1 :. :$. l 1 11 0 17 3 ...
� � � (
l5 - 1 "" lu � o c t c � �� . 1 ...,. 1'' 6 � .l t' Jv 1 ,., u 6. l """ tt.. ' � � J u. .yl 1'. f hX 175
-~ 2 � � I 17 6
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5173 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5173)
- CTA Case No. 5691 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5691)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CORAL BAY NICKEL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1543)
- CTA Case No. 1585 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1585)
- CTA Case No. 6824 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6824)
- FOUNDEVER PHILIPPINES CORPORATION (formerly SITEL PHILIPPINES CORPORATION) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10224)
- 3M PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8147)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v . JOSELITO B. YAP(CTA Case No. EB 2792)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.