CTA Case No. 2201 (Resolution)
HFPFHt.lC OF THI' EB 1 � 1 l" l~ T � I l X V 1 IU .L~CT,1IC C01 P �� , C . T � � C SS '"'2(1 PP tit �LonPr , - vr:rsuc - 'I'"' "SL P . vr'1 '. , 38 C 'I:I':ISSIOF:R Qli' L�ITFEU, 1 .-tr:vr ..:L1 , flPSIJODdent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 0::1D'8R -cting on petitioner ' s 11 UOTI OIJ Fffi r ....- _. OF COT.J"R'l' TO ,JITIIDR .:1 � .AL11 on the ground thG t the factual ~nd local issues of the case are similar to those decided by the upr0me Court in Manila Electric Company vs . Vera , 1- 29987 and Nanila ,lectric Company vs . Tabios , ~- 23847 , October 2,.., , 1975 , 67 SCR 351, and there b~}ng no objection on the part of respondent , the said motion is here- ccordingly , lPt this case be considered closed and t rminated . SO 0rlDER""":D � uezon City , pril 6, 1977 . ) c~o;un \L..l/rS ( Associate Judge cting re
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.