COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CITIAIRE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court of Tax Appeals QUEZON CITY ENBANC COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL CTA EB No. 2501 REVENUE, (CTA Case No. 9713) Petitioner, Present: -versus- DEL ROSARIO, P.J ., CASTANEDA, JR., UY, RINGPIS -LIBAN , MANAHAN, B A C O R R O -V I L L E N A , MODESTO-SAN PEDRO, and REYES-FAJARDO, JJ. CITIAIRE INDUSTRIAL Promulgated: SERVIC ES CORPORATION, NOV 0 3 2021 Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - -X (7P /.'/'/"� RESOLUTION For resolution is petitioner's Motion to Withdraw The Motion for Extens ion of Time to File Petition for Review filed on July 29, 2021 . Petitioner, in his Motion to Withdraw, alleges that on July 9, 2021 , he filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review with the Court En Bane upon his receipt of the Resolution dated June 3, 2021 issued by the Court in Division. While the aforesaid Resolution denied respondent's Motion for Reconsideration, petitioner erroneously thought that said Resolution disposed of his own Motion for Reconsideration albeit none was actually fi led by petitioner. Realizing his error, petitioner now moves for the withdrawal of his Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review. In the Resolution dated September 20, 2021 , the Court already denied petitioner's Motion for Extension of T ime to File Petition for Review for being belatedly filed.
RESOLUTION CTA EB No. 2501 (CTA Case No. 9713) WHEREFORE, premises considered, petitioner's Motion to Withdraw The Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review is NOTED WITHOUT ACTION. The case is deemed CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. ROMAN G. DEL ROSARIO Presiding Justice e. 9. ~o.{..,f?.-. ERL~UY JUANif'O C. CASTANED;4., JR. Associate Justice Associate Justice {!~ "7 /J6~uo4w:e~- ~.~ _..--.V~ CATHERINE T. MANAHAN MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice Associate Justice - MARIA LJUt:>::l I U->::IAN PEDRO M~ ARI~ AN IF VVJF. ..RE~ Y~-- FAJ~ .(R'~ DO Associate Justice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.