[ G. R. No. 38691. June 29, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38691. June 29, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38691
[ G. R. No. 38691. June 29, 1934 ]
SEGUNDO CARDENAS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. CONSTANCIA FRIAS, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________13th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Oriental Misamis________, dated the __________27th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellees_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-2092. April 06, 1948 ]
- [ G.R. No. 131843. May 31, 2000 ](388 Phil. 419)
- [ G.R. No. 138839. May 09, 2002 ](431 Phil. 675; 100 OG No. 11, 1558 (March 15, 2004))
- G.R. No. 191281, December 05, 2012
- [ G.R. No. 165548. June 13, 2011 ](667 Phil. 32)
- G.R. No. 68166, October 13, 1997
- G.R. No. 213486, April 26, 2017
- [ G.R. No. 104109. March 15, 1995 ](312 Phil. 418; 91 OG No. 39, 6292 (September 25, 1995))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.