CTA Case No. 2930 (Decision)
� EPUBi.YC �tr Til\! P 11,. PPI COU T ��t: 1'.\ X A PPE~. ~UJ:;ZOIJI CIT . � /WI NTHROP -~TEA RNS , I NC. , Petit ione r , - .ve r s u"s C. T. A. CASE Oo 2930 COMMI SSIONER OF I NTERNAL REVENUE , Responden t � X- ~- .- .- .- .~ .- .- .- .X DE C s 0 N The basic que s tion f or us i n t h i s c ase is t he .� c orrect c lassi ficat ion , f or s a l e s tax pur pose s , of t he "Tussy Produc t s" o f peti t i one r, namely : (a ) . Tussy Lemon Hand and Body Lot i on (b) Tu s s y Hand and Body Lot i on (c ) Tu ss Lemon Moi stur izer , a nd (d ) Tussy Lemon Cleansing Cr e am. Pe t itione r W i n thr op-~ te arn s , I nc. con t ends ha t i t s � Tussy Produc t s w s hould be class i fi ed as meqi- c i nal pr eparat i ons s ubjec t t o t he 7% sales t ax pr es- cr i bed i n Sec t ion 186 of t he 1939 Nat iona l In te rna l Reve nue Code , whi l e r e s pondent Commi ss i one r of I nte r na l Revenue ave rs t ha t t he a r e to i le t a r t icles or pr epa ra t i ons wi t h i n t he purv i ew of Section 184 (b) o f the same Code su bj ect t o the 7 0% s a l es t ax pres- c ribed fuer e i ne Sec t i on 84 (b) of the Ta x Code r e ads a t t he t ime as f ollows � 14L
� OECISIO - CTA CASE NO . 2930 .2 �,. "SEC . 18 4. per c e n tage tax on sales� gf jewelry, t oilet preparations a nd others . - There s hall be evied , assessed ~ and c ollected once only on every or i gi nal sale , bar ter, ex c ange, or similar tr ansac i on o nominal or valuable considera t i on i ntended to tr ansfe r owne ship of , or t itle t o , t he articles here i n- . be ow enumera t ed a tax e quivale n t o s eventy pe r c en t um of t he gross va l ue in money of t he ar ticle so s old, bar - . t er ed, exchanged, tr ansferred , sue t ax to be pa id by the manufacturer or pr oducer : Provided , further , That , where the articles enumerated here i n- . below are manufactu red out o f ma te ial s subjec t to t ax under t his section , the to tal cost of such ma t erials , as du l y establ ished , shall be deducti bl e f rom the gross selling pr i ce or gr oss value i n mone y of such manufactur ed ar t icles. XXX XXX XXX (b ) Pe rfumes, essences, eyt{ac ts , toile t water s , c9smet iCS 9 petroleum j e llies , hair oils , pomades , ha ir dressings, ha ir restoratives , a ir dye s , a roma tic oachous , toile t powde r s , and any simi lar s ubs tance, a rtic l e , or pr e par a tions, by whatsoeve r name known or disting ui s hed, and any of the above .. which are used or applied or i ntended to be used or applied for toile t pur - poses, except tooth a nd mouth washes, dent i fices ; too th paste , and talcum or medicated t oile t powde rs . XXX XXX . XXX . II Paren thet ic a l l y, it may be stated t ha t ar t i cles not enume r ated i Sections 184 , 184- A, 185 , 185-A , 185-B and 186-B o f t he t hen in f orce Na t iona l I nter na l Revenue Code are c ons i der ed or din y ar ic l es 6 i nc l.udi n9 med icina l pre para ions , subJ ect to the~ 143 '�� : r, . -.
OECI SIO � ... .. CTA CASE NO. 2930 � This amount rep r esent s ' t he d if ference betwee t he 70% sal es t a0x under Sec tion l 84(b) and t he 7% s ales tax i mposed unde r Section 186 . It maybe stated that in a previ ous letter II .. dated Aug ust 9, 977 r espondent , in rep ly to pet itioner 's l etters of March 24 , 1976 a nd Novembe r 27 , 1975 r equesting f6r a r ul i ng t ha t he "Tuss Pr oducts" be categorized as "medic ina l prepa rat ions 00 subj ect t o t he 7% sale s t ax prescr ibed in Sect i on 186 of .� the Tax Code , i nstead of 70% sales t ax , ru led t hat even assumi ng that s aid products are medicated , neverthe less t hey r emain unde r t he class ifica t ion of � toi l e t articles or pr eparat ions" subjec t t o 70% sales t ax . Ta king responden~'� f ai lure to t ake c ategorica l action on its claim for r efund or t ax c r edit fi l ed on January 17 , 1978 as i mpl ied den i a l t hereof , a-s the prescriptive period of t wo yea rs pr ov ided f or in t he then Section 306 of the Tax Code for the i nstitution of t he j ud ici a l su i t f of t he recover y � of any national internal revenue t ax al leged to have bee n e rroneously or i ll~gally c o llec te d was about to expir e , petitioner initiated t he pre sent action with this Cour t on J anua r y 20 , 1978 praying t hat its � Tussy Products " be declared medici na l prepa ration s 14-5 � 0 �� ,.
DEC IS ON � CTA CASE NO . 2930 - .3 sales a of 7 ~ . Petitione is a domestic corporat ion duly o r gan i zed and ex i s ti ng unde r t he l aws of the Philipp ine s , with pr i ncipa business address af o . 74 Epifanio de os San tos Ave nue , Mandalu�ong , Metro Manila . It i engaged i n t he manufacture a nd sa le of pharmace utic al , medica ted , cosmetic and toilet products , among whic h are the Tus s y Lemon Hand and Body Lot i on , Tuss Hand and Body Lo tion, Tu ssy Lemon Moisturi zer and Tus s y Lemon Cle ansi ng Cream , r e ferr ed to as "Tussy Produc t s ". On t he sa l e o f t he a for esaid pro~ ucts iD r the period starting from the 4th quarter of 1975 up to t he 4th qua rter o f 1976 , petitioner made a t o tal gross sales amoun ting to Pl,9 75 , 979 . 00 , with ~ ne t ... s a l e s of P809 ,2 44 . 00 . On s a i d net sale s , pe t i tione r pa id s al e s t ax in the sum of P566,4 71 . 00 at t he J ra te of 7 0 ~ unde r Se ction 18 4 (b) pf th~ Tax CodeA Conte nd i ng t ha the "Tussy Products " a re med i cinal pr epa r a tions s ubjec t only, to t he 7% s a les t ax prescr i bed unde r Sec tion 186 , petitioner fil ed on J an uary 17 , 1978 with r e spondent a wr i tte n claim f or refund or t ax c redit of the amo unt o f P594 , 260.00 as over paid sa l e s t ax fo the pe ri od star t i ng the Jrd quar t er of 1975 t o the 4th quarte r of 1976 . 14�-4 ! . ' . ..
DEC ISIO - CTA CASE NO . 2930 � .5 - subject to 7 ~ sales t ax , and t hat respondent be ordered to 4 rant pet i i oner'~ cl a i m f or t ax cred it / or re f un of the s um o f PS09,825 . 00 The a lleg~d ove rpa id saies t ax for t he r d qua rter of 1 97 5 ~ was e xc l uded from petit i one r ' s. claim. The parties are no t in dispute a s to the c omputa tion of t he �sale s t ax paid by, or t he amoun t refundable to petitioner , as the c ase may I n assaili ng peti tione 8 ~ r ig ht t o the r efund or t ax credi t of t he amount o P509 , 825 . 00 , r es- pondent rai ses t he issue t hat the Tuss y Produc ts� are t oilet article s or prepar a tions within t he pur view of Sect ion 184(b) pf the theQ National Interna Revenue Code , fall ing unde r the ter~ �x x x and any similar substance , rticle or prepara tions, by whatsoever known name known o r . distinguished i x x x excep t t ooth and mouth was he s , dentr i f i ces , t oo t h pas t e ; a nd talc um or medicated t oilet powders" . As re sponden t puts it , a l l toi let articles or pr eparations, excep for powder, come within t he� pur view of Section l 84 (b) of the Tax Code and t he refore t axed under said sect i on r egard l ess of whet he r t hey a re med icated or not . Conseque nt y, e ve n a ssum ing t ha t peti- tioner ' ~ "Tus sy Pr od uc t s ~ are med ic a t ea , ne ve rt he 14 6 ~
DECIS ION CTA CASE 0 2 930 6- less they r emain unde r � t he c l ass i f i ca t i on of �toilet artie es or preparations �, subj ec t t o I the 70i sa es t ax r escr ibed i n Sec tion 184 . Apparently , peti tioner does not quarre l with . responden t t hat toile t articles o preparatio s ar e t he sub jects of taxation of Sec tion l 84 (b). And the l aw seems clea on t h i s matter . Section l 84(b) ?f t he Revenue Code e nume r ates the articles or preparati ons t hat are sub' ec t to t he tax unde r said section and adds to the l is t " a nd any simi ar substance , a rticle or preparations , by whatsoever known name known or distinguished# x x "., I t i s a settl ed rule of statutory const ruction that where genera l wor ds fo l ow an enumera tion of persons or things , by words of a particular and s pecific meaning , such general wor ds are not t o be construed in the ir widest exten t, but are to be held as app lying only t o persons or things of .the same general ~ind or class as those spec i fica lly men- tioned . This r ule ' s c ommonl y called t he "ejusdem qene ris " r ule . (Ollada vs. Court of Tax Appe als , 99 Ph i l. 604 .. ) The t erm "any simila r substance , article or prepar at i ons � s hou l d t erefore be r e s t i c ted to subst ances , articles o prepar ations s i milar or 1 4 '7 .,' I ��- - - - - - - -
� DECISION - CTA CASE NO. 293 0 - .7 - i de tic a l to "per fumes, e s sences , ex trac ts , t oi let wa ters , cosmetics pe trol e um jelly, hai r oils, I pomades, hair dres sings , hai r r es toratives, ha i~ dyes , aromat ic cachous, toilet powders " which ~for � practical purposes and i n ever y day life a r e t oilet articles or preparations as stated in t he ti tle of Section 184. Thi s is re nde r ed clearer by the use of the wor d "simila r before the t e rm " substance , ar t icle or preparations", and the provisi on "any of ~ the a bove which are used or appl ied or i ntended to be used or appl ied for toilet purpose s" whic h f ollows there after . Thi s brings us to the definition of the term "to ilet preparations". Jur i sprudence defines it as 'Any prepar ation wh ich i s int~ nde d t o aff ec t , and conceivably, to i mprove t he bodily appearance , such a s a lotion intended to con tribute to heal t h and appearance of skin" . (Peroxide Chemical Co . v. Sheehan , C.C~ Ae No. 1146 2 , 108 F 2d 306 , 308 .) From t h is , we c anno t but extract the view th at any prepar ations or substances which are used or appl ied , or i ntended to be used or applied , for t oilet pur- poses or f or any purposes fo r which the art icles enumer ated in Sec tion 184(b) sub ject to tax there- i n are c ustomar ily used, are considered toi let 14 H
' -. � / DECISION - CTA CASE NO . 2930 � .8 - pr eparations , rega rdles s of t he name by whi ch t he y are known or d istinguished . They a re c ommonly and / primar i ly adjunc ts to the dai l y toilet, i ntendeq to be used in c o nection wi th t he care of t he bod1 , or applied to affect and , c onceivably , to i mp r ove t he body appear ance . Are t he "Tu ssy Products " of petitioner to ile t ar t icles or pre parations within the pur v i ew of Section 184 (b) .of the Nat ional n te rnal Re venue Code ? The Food a nd Drug Admi ni str ation (now Burea u of ~� ood a nd Drugs ) ~ a fte r sever al ana l yse s a nd e xam- i nations of t he "Tussy Products", i s sued a c erti f i- cat ion dated November 20 , 1975 (Ex h ib it " D") .t hat : November 20 , 1975 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I n vi ew of t he medicinal c omponents pre sen t in t he f ollowing products manuf - ac tu red in t he Phi lippines by Wi nthrop- Stearns , I nc., Mandaluyong , Riz a l for Valmon t Inc. , New Yor k , U. S . A. : TUSSY Hand a nd Body Lo tion with Vitamin A TUSSY Lemon Hand and Body Lotion wi t h Vi t . A TUSSY Cleansing Cre am with Borax TUSSY Lemon Mois turizer with Vitami n A the preparations are used in the treatme11t and prevent ion of s kin problems and f or medicated skin cleansing and to nutri f y sk in. 14 ~ .,
DEC IS I ON � CTA CASE NO . 2930 ~ 9- Furthe rmore,� t he followi ng pr oducts con tain saponaceous an d non- yo1at i 1e c om- ponent ~ in exces s of 5%: I TUSS Han d and Body Lotion - ,greater t han 10% TUSSY Lemon Hand and Body Lotion - � � greate r th a n 10% TUSSY C1eansi 9 Cre am - greate r than 60 % . TUSSY Lemon Mo i s turi ze r - 9 reate r t han 10% A8M. REGALA Deputy Adm i n i t ra t o r As explaine d by Mrs. Ofe l i a Ma rcos Al ba i n he r testimony befor e t h is Court (t.s n., J uly 20, 1979 , pp 9 -1 5 )~ t he r e sea r c h c hemist o f t he Food a nd Dr ug Administ r ation who conducte d the seri e s of t ests on t he "Tussy Produc t s � and pr epared he dr aft of the c er tific a t ion above-quo ted, V'tamin A a s c om- ponent of t he pr oduc ts pl ays a l arge par t in t he normal kera tin izat i on of t he skin7 Palmitate is t he J salt o f Vi tam i n A; wh i l e the medicame q t s Methyl-p- hydr oxy be nzoate and Prophyl-p-hydroxy benzoa te act a s an ti f ung a l a ge nt s . The medic ame nts of the "Tu ssy Lemon Hand and Body Lotion", a s eluci da ted by Mr s . Ma rcos Alba , ar e t he same as t he "Tussy Hand a nd Bod y Lo ti on " . Bo r ax or sodium bo rate a s rnedica n1ent i n the "Tu s sy Clea ns i ng Cr ea m'' acts as a mild ~strin - ge n t whe n us ed e xter nally, wh ile Alla n toin, aside 150
� DECISION - CTA CASE O. 2930 - 10 - ., f rom Vitami n A, Methyl'-p-hydroxy be n:Z'oa te a nd Pr ophyl-p- h1droxy benzoate , in "Tus sy Lemon Mo ist- ur izer", acts as a healing agent t hat stimulat e~ the growth o f heal thy ti s sues of t he skin. Me~ thol � i the "Tussy Products" acts as cooling agent and as an antiprurit c or counte -ir ritant, and t he s aponaceous content the reof reacts with an alkali to produce soap. (t.s . n., July 20, 1 979 , pp . 1 3 -~5.) The cert i fication c ommand s much respect and .� we ight , si nce it proc eeds from t he official of t he gover nme nt calle d upon to execute and i mp l emen t the f ood and dr ug laws of t he country. (Regalado vs Yu lo , 81 Phil. 17 3 7 Tan v s . Munici pa li t y of Pagb ilao , Quez on , L-14 284 , April 30, 196 3, 7 SCP-A 88 7; Com- . missioner of I nternal Reve nue vs. P.J. Ki e ne~, L- 24 754, Ju ly 18 , 1975 , 65 SCRA 142 .) . Considering the public and official character of the certification, anq respondent's failure to dispu te or controvert it, we .s ee no rea s onab le g r ound to deny t o the document the -fai t h and cre dence nor mal ly due t hereto. In the r e cen t case of Oro En terprises, Inc . vs . Comm iss i oner of Inte rna l Revenue , CTA Case No. 3004, April 15, 198 3, wherein the fa c tual se tti ng is comparable to tha t in the c ase at bar, this Cour t, speaking through J ud ge Ale x z. Reyes , made obs ervations in the fo l low- ing wo rd s: 1 51
. -� � DECI S I ON - CTA CASE NO~ 29 3 0 11 - In the ca se ~t bar we are not to confuse about a r are addendum to pharma- c opoeia in which f ac t and fabrication become i nd ist ing uisable but about the I usual attr'butes a n i mating t he meaning of medicina l preparati ons as legal ly con templ ated for tax purpose . It may � not therefore be an oversimplication to state that t he find ing of the Food and Drug Administr at ion furnishes t he best me ans of its own exposit i on i n terms of t ractable data ope nly laid and f ully disclosed and as such deserves t he cre- dence t ha t shou ld normally be ac c0rded . Responden point s to no irregul a r ity nor er r or of the r elevance and compe tence required to bash tha t pa tina of legi timac y over the cer tificati on . Fur the r, on t he functi ons and effects of t he med i cament s and c ompone nt s of t he "Tussy Products" on t he s kin, a we ll-known practising doctor who spec i al i zes in de rmat olog y and a 195 4 .,,OYM a \V"ardee in the f ie ld of medicine ,*testified before this Cour t , i nte r ali a , t hat : t.s.n ., Decembe r 1 3 , 1979 , pp. 29-33 .) . ~ (a ) . Vi tamin A, as f ound in the "Tussy Product s " , is for t he purpose of help ing the normal developmen t and grow th of superf ic ial skin cells, main t ain i ng p r ope r ke ra t in i zation of skin wh ich is essentia l f o r pu rposes of protecting t he body surface and regu l at i ng t he harde ni ng o f t he cells as t hey e mana te a nd emerge t o under go ha rd e ni ng . It ther e fore he ps i n the no rma l d e ve opment of skin ce l ls . Vi t ami n A ~ls o improves eyeqigh t, particularly nigh l vision und lwlp~> i t l t .llL *Dr . Pablo o. Campos l Vr�I.J..
.-- DECI SI ON - CTA CASE NO. 2930 .. 12 - nor ma development of ski n pores. (b) . Me thyl-p-lw roxy benzoate is used as a / means o f protecting or preventing, or controlliQg, t he gr owth of both bacteria and f ung i . . (c) . Prophyl- p- hyroxy benzoa te has the same eff ect. (d) Borax is an ant i sept i c , preventing the growth of bac te ri a, a nd at the same time an as t rin- gen t having a drying eff ect when applied to t he s kin exte rna lly. (e) . All antoin enhances proper formation of tiss ues i the granulation process, having a healing e ff ect. (f) The p r esence of Vitamin A, Nethyl-p-~yroxy be nzoa te , Pr ophyl- p-hy roxy benzoate , Al lantoin, borax and Palm i t ate in t he "Tu s s y Products" makes t hem have c urative effec ts . That i n the manufactu re of the "~ussy Prod uct s " t hGse med ic amen t s and c omponents were used a nd main tained all through out the manufac turing pro- ce s s at spec if i c weight , at prope r tcmp~ra t ur e and passed quality control test had been test if ied to by pet i tioner ' s assistan t plan t manager and shown in Exh i bi ts "G" to "V". Si nce petitioner ' s " Tussy Product~ ", by v i rtu e of their medicaments , functions and t he r apeucic 153
DECISION - CTA CASE NO . 2930 - .13 - us e s, are used in the t rea tmen t a nd prevention o ski n probl ems , it seems c le ar beyond doubt tha t the contr overted pr oduc ts in the wor ds again of . Judg~ Alex z. Reyes i n Oro Enterpr ises, "fit i dto � a n appropriate lega l cubbyho le for medi c i nal pre- par ations aptly c ha r acterized in a n a na logous ca se ~ 'A� used i n the Tarif f Act of Ma rc h 3, 1883 (C. l 21, Schedule 2 , 22 S ta .. 494) .t hese medic ina l pr epa ra tions me an such art ic le s , as are of use or be lieve d by th~ presc ribe r or user fai r ly and honestly to be of use, in c ur i ng or a l l evia ting or pall iat ing or preventing some disease o r affection o f the human bod y ' (La Tonde na, Ince vs . Col l e ctor of Intern a l Re ve nue and - CTA1 L-1433 6 , April 30 , 1964 , 1 0 SCRA 713.) ". In La Tondena , the Supreme Cou r t had oc ca sion to def ine t he t e rm "medic i nal preparations" as fo l lows : "Medicinal preparat ions" consists of J two words, ' medic i na l' and �~repar ation .' ' M.edicina l' means cu r ative o r a lleviative used f or the cure or alleviat ion of body di sor ders (Words and Phrase s, Volo 264 p. 61 6)e 'Preparatio~ a re t hose which are prepared or something equipped or compounded f o r pa rti c ular purposes (Wor ds and Phrases, Vo l . 33 , p. 350) . Med i cina l pr eparations are therefore descriptive of and r efer t o substan es used i n medi- cine and prepared for the use of the apotheca ry o r the physician to be admi- niste re d as a remedy for di ea s es . As use d i the Tar if f Act of March 3, 188 3, t hese medicina l p reparations me an suc h art icles as a r e believed by the pr escriber o user fairly and honestly t o be of use i n curing or allevia t ing or pallL)tinq or pr event i ng some disease or af fliction of the human bod y."
� DECIS ION - CTA CASE NO . 2930 - .14 - "This cour t $ hall avoid confus ing itself with te rms t hat have been we l l and c learly defined. I t shall not hesi tate to s tate t ha t petit ioner 's I pr oducts , espec ially rubb ing alcohol are medic ina l pre parations. The r ubb i ng alcohol which i s essentially denatured � � ethyl a l cohol is used as an ant iseptic to i nh i b it the growt h of bac te ri a . " The ne t result the r e fo re is that peti t i oner's "Tussy Produc ts " are .n...o....t. t oi let articles or p r epa- ra tions within the pur vi ew of Section 184 b) .of the 193 9 Na tional I nt er na l Reven ue Code . Accor d i ngly , such pr od uct s a re _n__o___t_. su b ject to the 70% sales t ax presc r ibed the r ein but to t he 7% sa les t ax unde r Sect ion 186 of the same Code . Section 186 provides th a t " articles no t en umerated in sect ions 184 , 184-A, 185 , 18 5 -~ , 185-B and 186-B", ar e o r J ina ry article z whic h ar e sub j ect to t he sales tax of 7%. Wo r t hwhi l e noting i n this connect i on are the f ol l ow ing rul ing s of r esponde nt on similar prod~c ts which a r e used , just li ke the "Tus sy eroducts " under c ons ider a ti on, in the tr eatme nt a nd p re ve ntion of skin p roblems: (1) Yang Fai Su Medicated Powder (' ream, G-Moon , Medic ated Powder Cre am and Ennro E-Moo n Medi cinal Face Cream, whic h are r egis tered with the Food and Drug Administrat ion an d certified to by s aid office t o c ontain s a lyc ylic acid and resorcinal wh ich act as ~eratoly t ic and antif ungal age n ts anu tha t Lhe y 1 55 :
' ~\ t --- � DECISION - CTA CASE NO. 2930 .. .1�5 - ., are i ndic ated for dem a~i t is, p r uritus and acne ttea t men t, a�re s ubject to 7% sales t ax pursuant I to Section 186 of the Tax Code (BIR Ru l ing March 26, � j, � 197 4, Exhibit " E-4 " ; For ma l Of fe r Pe t i t i o ner'~ Evide nce , Pe 3)~ (2) . Yardley Liquid Ha ir Con trol whic h c on tains I rga s an DP-3 00, a bactericide and fungic "de as c e r - ti f i ed by t he Food a nd Dr ug Administration is s ub- j e ct als o t o 7% sa le s tax (BIR Ruling, Ap r il 30 , 1976 , Exhi bi t "E- 6."; ib id. , P� 3) . ( 3) . B-M.oon Med icin al Cream and Sun Tung Med i- c ated Pomade which ar e Food a nd Drug Admi n i stra t ion r egistered an d ce rt ified to as containing med i caments which are anti-pru r itic, ke ra tolytic and an t i-bac t er ial a ge n t s, and c ont a ini ng al so 19.54% and 20.1 0% s apon a - c e ous ma t te r, are s ubject to 7% s ales tax pre s cr i be d i n Sec tion 18 6 of the Tax Code (BIR Ruling, Se ptembe r 8 1 19 76, Exhi b it "E-8", ibid., p. 3) .. ( 4) Ha ns on Her bal Shampoo and Hanson Super Fr e Sh Sh ampoo, c han ged to Morni ng Dew Herbal Shampoo t han 5% sapon ac eous matter and there f ur~ parta king t he na tu r e of soap and intended solely for deans i ng, a r e t axable at t he rate of 7% sales tax prescribed i n Sec tion 18 6 of t he Tax Code . (BIR Ruling, 1 5lJ
�- � DEC I SION CTA CASE NO 2930 - 16 - Dece mber 6 1 197 5, Exhib it "E-9." 1 ibid., p. 3) . (5 ) an�d other rul i ngs of t he Office of the I Re s ponde n t to the ef fect t hat medicina l pre parations and/o r those products c on tain i ng more than 5% sapo- � ,;.. naceous mat te r are s ubject to 7% sales tax (Exhib its "E", "E - ~" , " E- 2'' 1 "E-3.", "E- 5" and " E-"/," ~ ibid. 1 . p . 3) �. To our mind, the s;e ruling s have s l: r ong pe rsuasiv e for ce , e specially whe r e t he l aw-making au th or ity , with fu l l kn owledge of suc h inte rp retation, has r ee nacted t he provisions of Section 184 (b ) .and Sec t i on 186 of the 1939 Na tion a l Intern a l Reve nue Code i n to Sections 194 (b) .and Sec t ion 199 o f the 1 977 Na tional Internal Revenue Code wi t hou t sub- stan ti a l c ha nges . The v iew has often been expressed that reenactment of a law without substantial amend- ment after it had long been e nfo rc e d by a dminisua t ive offic ials char ged with its enforcemene is t antamount t o legis l a tive approva l d the administrative inter- pr eta tion . (As turi as Sugar Cent ral vs . Commiss i oner of Inte r nal Re ven ue , L-1933 7, Sept . 30, 19 69, 29 SCRA 617 ; Commissio ner of In t er nal Rev e nue v s . Ledesma, L-1750 9, Jan. 30 , 1970, 31 SCRA 95 : Inter-Provincial Au t obu s vs. Collector of Internal Reven~e, 98 Phil. 290; Mi ndanao Bus Co. vs. Co l le c tor of InternQl
,._, � DEC I SI ON - CTA CAS E NO . 2930 - 17 - Re venue, L-1.40 78 , Fe b.' 24 , 1 96 1, l SCRA 538 . ) . Fa r be it f r om a� the o r e tical gobbledygook t he ru l ing s I lend settl i ng eloquenc e to the pr eci s e issue raised i n the case a t ba r . (Or o Enterpri se s, I nc . v s .� Comm i ssi oner o f I n ter na l Re ve nue , supr .~ .) . I n a n e ff ort to d i scred it t he me d ici nal fu nc ti on s and ther apeut ic uses of pet itione r ' s "Tussy Products ", r esponde nt wou ld howP. ver f i nd comf or t in the l a be l s of t he produc t s which pr e s ent and descr ibe them as l o t ions , mo i stur i ze rs a nd cleans i ng c r e ams inste ad of name s a nd de s cr ip t i ons i ndic a ting t heir med i cinal cha r acte r i st i c s. Neve r th e le s s , t o quote once more t he obse r vations of Ju dg e Al ex z. Re yes on t his point i n Or o En terprise s : The a ppa r ent qu i bble on t he descrip- tive te rm , " l otion " as c r e a t i ng t he i mp re ssion an d evok ing t he conno tat ion that the p r ep ar ati on i s co sme ti c , doe s not c hange t he basic fact that the con- tr overted pr oduc t by nature, f ormulati on and pur pose, as found and certi f fed , is med i c in a l . �what ' ~ i n a name ? , t ha t wh ic h we c a ll a ro se , by any � o t he r name wou l d sme l l a s s wee t ! " We do not t hink t he c ert 'f ication is a mere cosmetic e ffort to d i s gu ise the tr ue na't ure and c har ac te r o f t he que s ti oned pr oduct. We t he ref o re f e el c ompe lled t o af firm i ts i mpo r t and fo rce lest i t be s uf f er ed to petr ify i n fu t ili t y. At a ny r a te , as e xp l a ined by pet i tioner i n h i s l ette r d a ted Ja nua ry 13 , 1978 to r espondent r e quesl i n ~ 158
~I rf't l I � f � DEC ISION - CTA CASE NO. 29 30 ... 1 8 a tax credit/refund of' the amount involved in this c ase , "these� names are marketing strategies desig ned I to att rac t mo re the buying publ ic that i f they are to be called by med ical names" (p. 28, BIR r eco�rds .) And a medicinal pre para t ion does no t l ose i ts char- ac t er a s such because it is sold over the counter to the public generally, rather than to druggist , phys ic ia n and me dic al institution to be admi nistered hype r dermically by physicians. (Vital Corp vs. Knox Co . , Cre st. & App. 143 F, 2d 883, 888. ) Hav i ng r e ached the conclusion that the "Tussy Pr oducts" i nvolved in this c as e should be classified as "med ic inal p reparations " subject to the 7% sales t ax presc ri bed in Sect ion 186 of the ~ax Code , in s te ad of t he 70% s a les tax pa i d by pe titioner under Section 1 84 ( b ) ~ p e titioner is the refore en t itled to the refund or tax cr edi t of the amo unt of ~509,82S . GO, r e presenting the difference betwee n th'e 70% and t he 7% sales tax f or the pe riod starting the 4th quarter of 19 75 to the 4th quarter o f 1976, the written clnim for r efund or tax credit th;�reol hclVl!l�J LJ(::cn J?L"OlJerly filed with respondent and the suit for recovery seasonably i ns ti t uted with this Cour t in accordance with the th en Se c tion 306 of the National Internal Revenue Code . 15U
DECIS ION - CTA CASE NO. 2930 - 19 - WHEREFORE, r e spondent Commiss ioner of Inte r- nal Revenue �is hereby ordered to grant a tax c r edit I in favor of petitioner Win throp-Stearns , Inc. t Qe amount of P509 , 825 . 00 . Without pr onounc eme nt as � to cos ts . SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metr o Mani la, May 30, 1983 . Q;ud~ AMANTE fiL LER Presiding Judge J WE CONCUR: 7C~~~0AQUIN Assoc iat e Judge 1 60
More in CTA Decisions
- FRUITS & DAIRY SOMMELIER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9720)
- HEDCOR, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1745)
- TAGANITO MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2055)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10530)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. 2100 CUSTOMS BROKERS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1729)
- JOHNNY SY CO v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET.AL(CTA Case No. EB 2832)
- ITW TEXWIPE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7357)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AJINOMOTO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1010)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.