[ G. R. No. 40205. July 05, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40205. July 05, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40205
[ G. R. No. 40205. July 05, 1934 ]
EDUVICIS DE LA CRUZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. HAW PIA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________7th__________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed with the costs of both instances against the appellee.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellant__________ recover from __________the appellee __________ the sum of P__91.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 5534. December 23, 1909 ](G.R. No. 5534)
- G.R. No. 157717, April 13, 2011
- G.R. No. 131492, September 29, 2000
- [ A.C. NO. 2591. September 08, 2006 ](532 Phil. 639)
- [ G. R. No. L-18081. April 30, 1963 ]
- [ G.R. No. 12391. March 26, 1917 ](G.R. No. 12391)
- [ G.R. No. 4397. October 24, 1952 ](G.R. No. 4397)
- [ G.R. No. 14881. February 05, 1920 ](G.R. No. 14881)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.