[ G. R. No. 39652. May 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39652. May 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39652
[ G. R. No. 39652. May 11, 1934 ]
EL AHORRO INSULAR, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. GREGORIO S. NARVASA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of the instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appelle_________ recover from ___________the defendant-appellant____________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-23-019 [Formerly JIB FPI No. 21-043-MTJ]. February 27, 2024 ](951 Phil. 674)
- [ G.R. No. L-13254. December 30, 1961 ]
- G.R. No. 230983, September 04, 2019
- A.M. No. 17-01-04-SC, February 07, 2017
- A.M. No. 01-9-246-MCTC, October 09, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 188417. September 24, 2012 ](695 Phil. 729)
- [ G.R. No. 162729. December 17, 2008 ](594 Phil. 609)
- [ G. R. No. 39742. June 07, 1934 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.