CTA Case No. 1256 (Decision)
p., ~/; y; in s ,qi.tt .- - � 16 J ~yul\. . . � -� - - - .... .. - .. ... i 1 � - � c i� I' ; 5t .. -
� n -- f it � 7 f � f � c- I' 52
� � 1- ... - �� � ... � � i � � s �y () � 1 .. ( f � � �I 1 � .. y - c1 - 1 t is I' : 53
� -- � 11 1 -� 1 1 - � �i - f $ � � �� � � �""� t t u1 � c c �n - �� s 1t 1 �- � I' ; 5 tl
c �1 � ... --t - . 1 1 c: 11 � 1 ---------...-- .. l .----------- -----------�--- � 1 � . 77� � �7 __ __..._ _ � ----�--.---....... I' 55
� - "" � I -- 2 .._____ � �-�- ----------� .... .--)� (� '� - c ��� l t sai t t '0 fc Y� ;, . 1 in- co. n k:s ly 11 v1 of- v (l X riz � he u �I vn 0 f e �� 0 h ti.on onee f � ' fi(; ; s "ti ...n 'i 0 of X� a c�n f of eti- nh tt of Int n1 d . y 1- y i i- a on f ' in � of tr d e� i neo - - -- - - 56 II I
�1 in - - J i i - e e 0 ... i c cy i� n fn - h 1 cy e e � I' ; 57
.. n ni � �� n 0t � � .') � I' . 58
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.