[ G. R. No. 40768. August 21, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40768. August 21, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40768
[ G. R. No. 40768. August 21, 1934 ]
ELISEO ATIENZA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. GUILLERMO GESMUNDO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________4th________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Laguna_________, dated the _________15th__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with cost against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 198450, January 11, 2016
- [ A.M. No. P-96-1205. July 24, 1997 ](342 Phil. 1; 94 OG No. 31, 5404 (August 3, 1998))
- [ G. R. No. L-15467. January 31, 1963 ]
- [ G.R. No. 165443. April 16, 2009 ](603 Phil. 295)
- [ G.R. Nos. 127660 & 144011-12. September 17, 2002 ](437 Phil. 566)
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-92-836. August 02, 1995 ](317 Phil. 9; 92 OG No. 17, 2531 (April 22, 1996))
- G.R. NO. 163118, April 27, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 58610. September 30, 1982 ](202 Phil. 908)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.