[ G. R. No. 40569. August 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40569. August 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40569
[ G. R. No. 40569. August 28, 1934 ]
FIDEL REYES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. GONZALO PUYAT AND SONS INC., DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________11th________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the _________31st__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance to be taxed against the plaintiff and appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the defendant and appellee__________ recover from __________the plaintiff and appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-16-2452. March 09, 2016 ](783 Phil. 9)
- [ G.R. No. L-46562. March 31, 1978 ](172 Phil. 272; 74 OG 10713 (December, 1978))
- [ G.R. No. 51084. December 26, 1984 ](218 Phil. 676)
- G.R. No. 154112, September 23, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 68729. May 29, 1987 ](234 Phil. 443)
- G.R. NO. 149238, November 22, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 35524. March 18, 1932 ](G.R. No. 35524)
- [ G.R. No. 9144. March 27, 1915 ](G.R. No. 9144)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.