CTA Case No. 3590 (Resolution)
�.t:l't.JBLI~ OF 'HE t"l-�1Lt'PPIN:r'9 ~URT OF TAX .f\t'P.E::.Al-CJ Q\JKOJt CJ rtr EL..;C KlC HILl"t"'ll ...~ . 1 0C � � P t i tio r. - veraua - c . T . , � eN�r: o. 3590 1E L s nd n � R ~ 0 LU 10 ctinQ n th " ion 1' Oiam1sa� fil d eti ion r n J ly 1 � 1 7 on the r und h t h a se a for d ficie cy 1 tax inv lv . .,. h r in h lread ro 1 e n aettl d t hr u h purau to x cutiv or er ith p ti ion r ayin he of 36. 11. o. nd th re inQ bj tion on t rt f r on �t id ..... ion 1r TI:::D. ec rdingl , l h 1 n f. r revi w di S l . d ~ liS C c n� i r el d end t r- � D.. D. n c y. etr 1.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.