CTA Case No. 3355 (Resolution)
� tlJ!'"�JPUC 0,. ��HE f'}JU .t~~�l'll"9 ~OU'RT Of' TAX i.F-1'�.\U Qt....�..~te o n BJ SERVIc:� UTERMATlONAt. INC.. . Pet ftioner. CO~N SSl . OF l TERnAL RiEVEUUE, R�.SOLUTI N Act1ng .. t t.Lce:. ~t1tioner having been reftmdt>d subs ant1ally, to its. full r nd .riu t e *' tte 1100t. a d ther... ~ing no ob.:ect1cn on th~ p rt ~ th~ s id ~ion is ueraby GRAN ED. Ac rdingly, let the petit1on for �t�v1t::); b. crms'dred i trH. ram cmd tl"~e c"sf� de ~,.'lfl!d clo.st:d ~nd tert"11nat d. ~E' . p,~_,h l~~ '-"""""""_,,J.,r." I rn .. :~u n Pres i d1 ., .mclue .. Q I"" (Xi el t J �J<:W
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.