SPI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Hepub11c ot the ~h1l1pp1nes COURT OF TAX APIJEALS l}uezon Lity SPI TECHNOLU61ES, lNC., CTA CASE NO. 5903 1-'et: :i. t 1 oner��., ~ . EEB 28.?000 -- Vf?t"'SUS -------- X COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE~ Respondent. RESOLUTION Conrir�'ming tr1e or��cler' qiven Hl open Cour-t on 1- e br�' uar'Y 20UO, Pet 1 t i oner�,; s filot ion to W1 t hdr'<:H"'-1 Petition is GRANTED. Let, the Petition for Review be considered withdrawn and thi~ case be deemed closed and t er'lll i n21t ed. SO ORDERED. ~~'~- ERNESTO D. ACOSTA 1-'r"esidinq J�udge <On Leave> RAMON 0. DE VEYRA i=lssociate Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- PCI MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. v. KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES IN HER CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9038)
- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY ALFONSO G. CUSI v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE CAESAR R. DULAY(CTA Case No. EB 2241)
- JEWEL PAWNSHOP, CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 36)
- CTA Case No. 2363 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2363)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. EDS MANUFACTURING, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2411)
- P3OPLE4U INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9923)
- CTA Case No. 3410 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3410)
- CTA Case No. 3462 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3462)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.