[ G. R. No. 39231. July 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39231. July 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39231
[ G. R. No. 39231. July 02, 1934 ]
IRENES CUEVAS AND PAULINO CARIÑO, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. FORTUNATO JOSE ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________15th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________29th__________ day of _________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed. Cost in both instances against the appellees.
It is further ordered that __________the appellants_________ from the __________the appellees _________ the sum of P__93.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 34658. October 01, 1931 ](G.R. No. 34658)
- [ G.R. No. 88795. October 04, 1994 ](307 Phil. 355)
- G.R. No. 185549, August 07, 2013
- [ G.R. No. 117190. January 02, 1997 ](334 Phil. 68)
- [ G.R. No. 130008. October 25, 2004 ](484 Phil. 217)
- [ G.R. No. L-23861. February 17, 1968 ](130 Phil. 600; 65 OG 9613 (September, 1969))
- [ G.R. No. 222892. March 18, 2021 ](899 Phil. 170)
- [ G.R. No. L-551. September 11, 1948 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.