CTA Case No. 3402 (Resolution)
AYALA INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT C.T.A. CASE NO. 3402 CORPORATION, Petitioner, - versus - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X R E S 0 L UT I 0 N It appearing that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing its appeal to this Court as manifested by counsel in open court on October 21, 1988 on the ground that the Bureau of Internal Revenue has already granted the claim for refund involved herein, and there being no objection on the part of respondent; The Court resolves to dismiss the above-entitled case and considers the same closed and terminated. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, November 29, 1988. AMANTE F LER Presiding Judge Associate Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- ASIA RENAL CARE PHILS., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8832)
- IBMS TECHNOLOGY PHILS. CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10177)
- MONTALBAN METHANE POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2611)
- CTA Case No. 548 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 548)
- MISAMIS ORIENTAL II RURAL ELECTRIC SERVICE COOPERATIVE, INC. (MORESCO-II) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10145)
- AIR DRILLING ASSOCIATES PTE LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10752)
- NEGROS SUGAR FARMERS MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, BIR REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGION 12, BACOLOD CITY(CTA Case No. 9810)
- GE CONSUMER FINANCE, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9144)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.