CTA Case No. 216 (Decision)

- .>- .vul:U � -� - -. - - - -~ . - -- - � � 1 .~ er ' et al � �- offlc� c ne in � 1 !)3, � 1\b on ~. �� y � � 2. 1 � tncorpo u � c �� al ally 11- ance lch lc it nl c � �f � tve et �- ' n� ft' 5 t. ent ec:- � II

.- ' .21 - 2- - � the c ��� c:t f � � d, � t)\ �� 1 1�� � n- Yla �� 0 � c.,. � t. it f � � ta � r of t ve a-rt ttl c t �- t c �a lllecl �r� of t � itl.,... l� e lU cno c of � tda rM�l H !� tt f- � �n � - lllecl y the cent al � y t � :ltf. n�~ o t to 10 tlon y vht � of ct � una , o al 6 /()

� 21 -- f t 11 .. X � y� � 'a a� � i� n-... - ly � � h � s� � - eo � er � c � 5 � of t � 1 'f � he � c� X �c lly �t~ � tt � � �� 7

... p- � t� y� 1 � � �' � pa ~ p 25 , I �� nd lc et � ~. 18 in~ la � t� y X ion 1 9 o - s tt of fa t . he X �� p�tlt1on � � X 1 � ,� 8

�2 -<;,� - t 0 nt a ion t nt 0 ly 1 1 d 0 � � 1 ly not c t t nt X /1 1o l 11- y � n � tion �� ti y l tX � $ o erators of lee i l ,

-10- � 216 �- coc t 0 l 1il ' c n Ul�� .a ��l c t 0� � 1 ly 0 ll ��� �� � e I c t� � P'lr a � � a cei XXX X r al JC �r� x ~ tQ' 1w a 4611 , ct. � � Int� ).- � � ldeRt � 111ft� (� � 10

h -..,. I .. _I I- i p 1 o! - � � c t� .. � � 1� 11