CTA Case No. 5074 (Resolution)

.REPURLfC 0 "J'H.Jt: l?RU,IVPINES. :!OOR'l' 01<' 'l'AX APPF.AI,S QUF;:t. .J II CJ'&'Y FAR EAH'J' HANK AND 'l'ROS' COMPANY. 'Pat. i. .loner, - V< raus - C. T .A. CASlf' NO ~ 5t '14 "OHMISBION.t<::R W IN~rF;RN, I. RE\/1<-:NUE , Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - Conf rm1ng the . -r�dor� in open court; on .'ebruarg 3, l99b, pet..itionar .. a motion cmd manif'tmt.atlon that; �or l"efund or tax crHdJt :In t.h1a at-t-a be dianuas d t 1 rea ct t.o the witi hohho t.~ ~ pa.id on TOte , J t:'lUre Sa .t e caua �t�ax Gr .d1.t Gert;tt:ieut~ ( SN .hJ4)4.. b has b o lS~med in ii.s favo by r .apon lent. '"":llmlll.!';n;.iionf.n~ nr: fnternal Revenue .in th sum o � nnd t; at the iauue tq 0 ..l - Let pe.ltioner"'s elaim for� refund or t.'Elx t>ad.it of the w thholding tax: 1n question be therefore co id red closed a.ud t~Illl nrt.ed. 96