cta_decision CTA Case No. 25752575 1977-04-06

CTA Case No. 2575 (Decision)

tr >;'�:!'PPt f'F T 1-~ PH TLIPPI~Et ' 'L .. " :\P PEALcl )l "'J.l'; CITY � . o �. ' h ,.. DO' " .. . i' .t 1' 1 �

� - ")7 � ~?- .. t - t pl in t , h t th / $ . nd .... t th 1ort f: an11 rc 2v l 6 4 ol a : n tin. !nth n g1:1ed t or ave rln~ ill o. 1� 3 n t . hi �s 1f t th oc ela.r o only 1 �5', 0') , lbs , fAH" n � th i er ... V' 1 ..ntr:-1 o. ~ .33 ? 3 .. . 196 a n.<' tn 't 0 th o r e 1 t S' o :rt� n d y �po �� l pp a1 er- !l no .1 t t-nt~ , .J at~ pr11 l 1969� the tu l 1 ht f e O'Qd r; , -l 1 s ... n t �nc . , ttl r . ' as 1 c ep nc in ~ipht 0 !!1+ , 811 lb � ~� erce agewise .,, th. tncr . . e Ot" ,,is- cr ney in 1 t 9 7. z.; ov r r cl r � ..1 ht. '� � July 19 d �.. G t 1 n1 f! h tn .Law 1Vi lon of 0 r. u tc s . e tt r t tition rt ... o � Inc � 8 nt t s ess l v� r .�,uir1 ,, it to l in v h no d in1$tr tiv i c boul 1 po 1 fo tb v r ;t 1ncr � e in � ei t of th isehar t at v.h cb 1s d.clar o �i the bill o l din an ship ' nif s n iz un l" "e ion 523 th ri d Ctt tom od � 232

�I ..vI .J. . . ,I,. :7 � J' - n � ' r l;, 1 1".'�- rc � t ., fj ".".. "0 "'(" � tt t t: ill. ts 1 " th . 0 tn � t h th < h~:;"r ig 0 .,.. o- � h 1 t :\ "�� v :"!; ~~ i " �.t .,n ""h ~ 'd t 1'1 t .... .. -ar :t" g �t . 1 ti.� 0 h th ' t 0~ th;.... .c .f.: o' e: � .) '(>f . l' . .ht on i;.h s1 0 hv i ~ �1 :�� r pcce . 0"' thes �* ' !':tC; 1 t.icn. ... o .. s"~_tr " gur.>" ~ 1 > tne h .n s " ll .(' 1 0~ t .. t or f' C< �ci; t t c+;~""' 1 .. 11 ' 1t 0 ,... ~ C" �or c .. 0~ r:u ,.~ Cod � 233

-- 1 � I~ - l ' . '

� "1')7 - 5- .r ) re 1 1 0 r .on er 3 ri Cu � n 235

257. -i "\. � i. 0 0. 4, 11 1 0 ~l C' � � "'5 n v h ... "' h i t- r ' v 0 .3? or .04 v lt.t �) ft r } ' I C? � 4, 1 1" .; n t i 0 t l t f.. _ . 0 f th. l' ;h � � 1 6 , , 77 1 '~- vO l' '� c 236

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.