[ G. R. No. 37924. July 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37924. July 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37924
[ G. R. No. 37924. July 11, 1934 ]
MARIA CLARIDAD ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. FLORENTINO CLARIDAD ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Occidental________, dated the __________25th__________ day of _________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. No expression as to costs.
It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. 07-2-26-MTC. March 07, 2007 ](546 Phil. 449; 104 OG No. 6, 886 (February 11, 2008))
- [ G.R. No. 12406. March 15, 1918 ](G.R. No. 12406)
- [ G. R. No. 17570. October 30, 1962 ]
- [ G. R. No. L-7923. November 29, 1957 ]
- [ G.R. No. 143646. April 04, 2001 ](408 Phil. 503)
- G.R. NO. 128338, March 28, 2005
- G.R. No. 238059, June 08, 2020
- [ G.R. No. L-31225. June 11, 1975 ](159-A Phil. 593; 71 OG 7162 (October, 1975))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.