CTA Case No. 2332 (Resolution)
'.'~r..:: ,N....;~u1:. 4.u B. .. ll.. C.t'"' �.!.hi' ILA , .28-v.Ll.i..;l... er , - versus - ... C.. "E v � - � �~ . T dE C0~\.u.I.::>ol0h~rt v ' I.'lBJ.G,, L .L LVEI'IUE , 1 espono.ent o ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - .~ 0 h 1) E. 1~- 1.C':' -l~G on petitioner ' ul-totion To Dismis su ~iled on iebr a~i lu , 1977 on the grounu that the only re ainin0 issue in tn.:.s c cse involving the assessment f ::~ r u ....c vllD.er/~Jdry stawp tax r'or the year 19b) in the o.mount of .j , rb) . o9 has al- reaa.y oeen c ance11eu a.na witho.rawn , anu the re bei g n objection or opposition on the part of res ono.ent , the sai mocion is ereby 0 ... 1 ]\:'L_.D . let th i s c a~e be consiu ~ rea c losed ana t er ..�ina tea . uezon City , Marcn 1~ , 1977 .
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.