PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JUNRIE DAITOL TENORIO, C/O GEMMARY PAWNSHOPS AND JEWELRIES, NO. 32-7 JULIANA TRADE CENTER, P. LOPEZ STREET, CEBU CITY

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, CTA CRIM. CASE NO. 0-417 Plaintiff, -versus- Members: CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson ; CASANOVA, and COTANGCO-MANALASTAS, & Promulgated: JUNRIE DAITOL TENORIO, L AUG 07 2014 Accused . r? ~:2.1""" fJ- A, X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,/- - - - - -X RESOLUTION Section 7 of Republic Act No. 9282 , which took effect on April 23 , 2004 , amending Republic Act No. 1125 [the law creating the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA)], provides: Section 7. Section 7 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7. Jurisdiction. - The CTA shall exerc1se: (a)x x x (b)Jurisdiction over cases involving criminal offenses as herein provided : (1) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code or Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Bureau of Customs: Provided, however, That offenses or felonies mentioned in this paragraph where the principal amount of taxes and fees , exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is less than One million pesos (P1 ,000 ,000.00) or where there is no specified amount claimed shall be tried by the regular Courts and the jurisdiction of the CTA shall be appellate. x x x "

Resolution CTA Criminal Case No. 0 -417 Pursuant to the aforequoted provision , the CTA has exclusive original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code or the Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Bureau of Customs where the principal amount of taxes and fees , exclusive of charges and penalties , claimed is P1 ,000,000.00 or more. Where the principal amount of taxes and fees , exclusive of charges and penalties , claimed is less than P1 ,000,000.00 or where there is no specified amount claimed , the same shall be tried by the regular Courts and the jurisdiction of the CTA shall be appellate. A perusal of the Information filed in this case shows that there is no specified amount of taxes and fees claimed . What was mentioned in the Information was that accused in the year 2006 earned and received a total income of P264 ,626, 744 .78 . Pursuant to the aforecited provision , the CTA has no jurisdiction over the charge , jurisdiction being vested with the regular Courts. This Court, therefore, is left with no recourse , but to dismiss this case. WHEREFORE , premises considered , the case-in-caption is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction , without prejudice to filing the same in the proper forum. SO ORDERED. JUA~O~- ~fs;A~b~ :JR. Associate Justice ~ ~c~~~ CAESAR A. CASANOVA AMELIA R. COTANGCO-MANALASTAS Associate Justice Associate Justice