[ G. R. No. 38667. June 29, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38667. June 29, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38667
[ G. R. No. 38667. June 29, 1934 ]
MAXIMO LIOANAG APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. DIONISIO L. MOSTAJO ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________13th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________21st__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement as to cost. in this instance.
It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G. R. No. 45591. October 15, 1937 ]
- [ G.R. No. 45400. April 14, 1939 ](G.R. No. 45400)
- G.R. No. 171836, August 11, 2014
- [ G. R. No. L-16749. January 31, 1963 ]
- [ G.R. No. 4056. February 07, 1908 ](G.R. No. 4056)
- G.R. No. 176229, October 19, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 114388. March 12, 1996 ](325 Phil. 97)
- [ G.R. No. 122095. September 13, 2001 ](417 Phil. 443)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.