CTA Case No. 1852 (Decision)
ll E l' r IC OF TH E PHILIPPi ~JIS l-<lll\1 <1F TAX APPE ALS QUE~O ' CI1'Y .... - ... ... . .. ' pt t �' � � t � I - 0 0 212
� ' 52 ... ' ' :' 213
c CIScIO,., o. 1852 3 propo � s s ~~ t on th~ gro u d t a t t 1 s ol~ l y as :: COI1tr ctor n ot ~ a co t act -r a . rnan c t r t th s M tiPJ � 0 I b a. y 22 , 9 7, s .t 0 r.1al l y ., a - ... f ro pot it i oner p y .ant or 104, 33 � rl f Ci ncy pe rc nt a.g t � xAs ~ t> na t� .., ma nuf'act e an c n- t ~cto � o r 19 2 a 1963 . 'r h c ;. i r a.s s " S I:.'St t WaS mod � i � d and e uc lat r on by r ws o n nt t �3' , 7 ) � 79 , comp ut ed a s f ollow ' The 0 to b3 r s ol ve i n t h is app!l) al i s ih t h r or o t -::.t it ion~ r is a anuf ;. ctur .r or contr a c t..- or of p t ess r1 cone pr o . cts s bj ~ c t to the 7% sa os t a 0 th~ 3%co tra c to ' s ta npo. by s c tions 18 191 0 t ho ax Co e , os c ti v l y .- Potit i on r c a i m ns is ts t h t, un . , t h a c ts obta i nin ' in t hi cas , t is co ntra ct r e . ' a e i n t h n a ct ur . of pr stross com on t pa ts of buil i n s , brid s, s p c i.fic pr o j c ts, a n o t r con- s tr uc t ion �or k pon s p c i~ l o rs a nd , t h r o , i t i s c contractor s ub j .c t to t e 3% t ax pres crib"" by s c tion i' 214
.c "T 1~1 c , t.h t o.t , 1ch r s f1n t p t1tt r- e. ctton 194{ ) cr t !' 215
�.- "";'1C 7.) I ]" - CT.~ ...:1r- .!1 r-;o. 1 852 5 s a man .ct ur .r of prestr~~se . co nc r3 t a pr od - ucts , p'Slt i t ion-~ is s � b j"'c t to th -:. 7~ t a x i po" e" b y Se c t i o n 1 6 o t e s ~me Co e , wh i c in p r t ~ ~o v i s: 3% contr a c t o ' s ta by Se ct i on 191 of n o Co e i s e se t :ia.l l y t a o t h s 1~ of sarv ce , l abo r ~ __ t .r i' 1 o c o ntr a c to r , wh i le a... S ction 18 . o t he s me Cooe , s upr a , i s l~ V i � upon =n, � f ct ur~ _ , p r o uc ~r or 1m - po t e r o tl e o r i ~inc 1 , ul , b, -r. t ..- , xc ha. c e , t ans.fo r of ti tl t o tic a rt .icles e nwner t e t he r i n . n~ r ing qui p ..e t a S ppl y Co. ~. Com � , CTA Case i'o. c_Bl , :ov. 29 , 19~ 6 ; $ . es ino 'o <.~. o. v. Col l . ' BTi c So ro. 195, Oct.- 4 , 954 , ;;..... f ' o i n J e L � ro. t -85o , .:;- . 3 , 195 ., 99 hi l . 841 . ") Our Ci � i l o i s t 1n -" i sh � s ~ co nt r � c t of s � 1 .fro m a c o ntr a c t f or " p i c ~ o wo k in th i s wb e: 1 T. 14 7.- co . tr~ ct for t 1�. l iv r y a t - c a~ta i n price o � an a r t i - cle h i ch t h ve n or 1 t h i i na ry I' 2 16 ,.
� r~Cl'BlO � t..;T. Ci ;;:. ~ N � 1852 ot:td uQolltt" ctor't hati co � to b .�~ w�ith t t" e � to p �... on ho1 ln tl'Y p �rtZu.1t ot a~n nt bus1 s~, to .o n s cU'tc p e of Job or� �Qr for oth r pa ons tn~ is own . ans " n-1 ,.. tho -s vi thcut lH\ mit tin,g hirn(J~tr to control to th~ P� tt,y � taUs. th t .r test of a. '1eontrae o:r� w ul . ~ m to b~ th- t h., r n;, 1:s s '1.,. # not �. s to thel � � � by wh1ch it is. to be ooomplish 1 � {Luzon & ~ ~..o rin.; Co.� v"' T~in:l( d t ~3 PhU 803. ) {r. J'oo b~ t p ttt1on1r � o:tpat"t � .it. s rl'.i p o~ et o i&n ~�n in~ r d.lr1nJ th& y l� rs in it put , tn ,. xpla.1n1r.tJ tt. oo �u.r or p titio r ' aat itt s � t stir~ ~ l.lbstan 1 lly ac follows~ ,, 217
c 4 1:o. 1852 ~"~ � 7 � ,; 218 '
� � 219
;PP� 33-35, � �n.' ~.:;,r n� 3/30/7 3' d. .=... �t i ' ..,/ 30/'tO; p � 3 �3t.:, ' s..�. ,, 220
oJ '!' ll � tl ' th,.__ nc c th tor . l~ t ; ~ ill tar!. bl ' 2 1 Ck ' 1 t n� '1 chi c� t c lar r t't� ' bu.11 .... n. t in Ul"� .m nts or J), t; h .y ,.,_ not s1z ow torr~ . ~o~ x � ol~t p� � e bu.t . n~ 1 p t"4 tn :r PO t , t � !.t~ 1 t tr 1' tn~ �d sp� otri ~rl b - 1 &: i� 2 21
c - � J. � ;~ 11 rc l, .S, r 1: Qer � T D; er r - illal" t r i ' vr v 1 l in \. .l , '},; i~t - cta.r l' l p ,tor. ' .1c .l wa , r <i tJl � ' l) 2 2 2
' .c CT 1 () t - llo n~ e � an :n~�. 1t pp1 ~ 1962 tor 1 1 ( ) 1t cur ~ or 1ts b ""1 or ipts (3) t. r (C- 1 )J 1. nc rpo h cn to �.o ca r n n � 01 n. ' et'!o' ions wa."l t .. t eo acto � opo nt h t pl')"t � r �C 0 o. t n� 1n !.> � c u.n u-1 c f ~0. p ct ; 223
- 5 3 t t .... tt 1 c 1 1 1. 0 1 0 ? 22 4
,c .' c t ' i 1972 t Q 0 10 - h t i: 2 2 5
... 0 cti 1tv o � io 1h t 0 .. e t 11 e c lti t tt s 0l 0 ,, 1 tf.! 0 l - l �o a� t 1C "l ' Cl t b t '1 1 to ol ., 2. I p i' 226
r~cxe~x-o:. - � - 8:12 I 1 or t .. o nr1 p!l. t th -c e n� t hown th~ t - Pl' J o ly ~ .- t r h~v _ t hd by tV' sha , 11"> to :t n p on -0 ny ox� t: t1 P- t d OOQC uct a� 1t1 -r with ut - p~cial or _ J c cl :ton t t p 'CL C t - � n ra.l � � lie. f=' 22- 7
� .c 17 ~�� � t1not1o t�fi 'D t i "' tht . t1 1 tr etor ithi th p tio 91 c1t1 ... s tc Co. � Coll n, 0 ty b ~ tb t. .t 11 1 .. t . n~r~ o. 19 .�h te et ,.c.,:.' tt to Vi. , t n �. .hteh t ,. r� ~ t:J�L 'r �0 cto or c 1 e. p. th �, r it t- y,' tO'r,Y pro 1..:3: io 1 t.h ~ ppl cah l- t c� ' e� t b' r- ' t! .,. by 1� tto p ' p s1 . lid1t th. . ch 0 1 e t �T lt!;l') on J 1 . i' 2 2 8
' � 52 18 t cto""l1 .4 �1 ~ J'l w1t..'l1 <:: tt' c 0 � I t .. n r tr ct l. to Th I CO t� ot ' ts" ' n � 4 . ::otpa1 u ''la! c or t b ~ .cl tt c hj.,.et to ho .:!0 t ";!0 . r' - y n ct:iJ 191 ot,� t u.rl.n~ t:
- .. ..CISIOj. - CT C c1r<. t o. 1 52 9 b t~ � � t ut pro ~c - . n1 .~ t so , CO/ CU: 1 i� 23 0
More in CTA Decisions
- BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 4481)
- AIR DRILLING ASSOCIATES PTE LTD., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10399)
- MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS CORPORATION [Formerly: SOUTHERN ENERGY ASIA-PACIFIC OPERATIONS (PHILS.), INC.] v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6970)
- CTA Case No. 5964 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5964)
- CTA Case No. 206 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 206)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 7886)(CTA Case No. 7859)
- SOLID-ONE MILLS PHILS. INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8559)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. NEGROS DEL NORTE PLANTERS ASSN. MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE(CTA Case No. EB 1012)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.