jurisprudence G.R. No. 34219G.R. No. 34219 1932-04-05
[ G.R. No. 34219. April 05, 1932 ]
[ G.R. No. 34219. April 05, 1932 ]
G.R. No. 34219
[ G.R. No. 34219. April 05, 1932 ]
BAYLOSIS ET AL. VS. INFIEL ET AL.
D E C I S I O N
Real actions. Sufficiency of evidence; judgment for plaintiffs affirmed.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.