SC Decisions G.R. No. 34219G.R. No. 34219 1932-04-05
[ G.R. No. 34219. April 05, 1932 ]
[ G.R. No. 34219. April 05, 1932 ]
G.R. No. 34219
[ G.R. No. 34219. April 05, 1932 ]
BAYLOSIS ET AL. VS. INFIEL ET AL.
D E C I S I O N
Real actions. Sufficiency of evidence; judgment for plaintiffs affirmed.
The Supreme Court E-Library publishes only this citation record for the document — the full text is not available in the source the library indexes. Everything the source provides is shown above.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 9945. November 12, 1914 ](G.R. No. 9945)
- [ G.R. No. L-23991. September 27, 1968 ](134 Phil. 207)
- [ G.R. No. 222366. December 04, 2017 ](822 Phil. 23; 114 OG No. 37, 6476 (September 10, 2018))
- [ A.C. No. 13557 [Formerly CBD Case No. 14-4293]. October 04, 2023 ](947 Phil. 642)
- [ G.R. No. 206767. September 11, 2019 ](862 Phil. 614)
- [ G.R. No. L-36343. May 04, 1989 ](255 Phil. 11; 86 OG No. 53, 10066 (December 31, 1990))
- G.R. NO. 142641, July 17, 2006
- [ G.R. No. 16897. January 31, 1962 ](G.R. No. 16897)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.