CTA Case No. 3803 (Resolution)
f .. - ~ -.;l)u.: ;,: DAVAO IMPO ~ DIST IBU � I �� Petitioner. - versu - c.r. � C SE NO . 3803 TH OF 1 TE R�ea n nt. X- - - ., - - - ._ - X ~SOLUTIO tin9 on the � tio ithdr w Petit1 For evi w" filed by pe itioner on April 23. 1 97 on th gr un th t he s s nt of surtax on unre onable c tion of lua inv lv d h rein h d lre dy en tn subject co promise ttle- nt purau nt to �xecutiv Order � .t4, with p ti- tioner paying th mount of 45,736 . 05, anu t.. .t beinc; obj ction on the p rt f res n ent, the said ion is her by TED. ccordinQly. let the tition for review it dr wn a hi c se con ider d clo nd t r in ted. zo Ci y, tro M nil � ~ay 1 , 1987. 12 S
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.