cta_decision CTA Case No. 236236 1957-08-05

CTA Case No. 236 (Decision)

r( I __. l TJ F PliTLlPPl"U l l�.A �" - sua c. r.A. �2 x- � - - � � - � � � � � � - -x C I~ 1 1a ts an ap al ln er ed y the etltl a ld , L tea n Vlole , all ..��� n- � rla � e on el n , n � a of .tal uat a1n �0 p �� nting n fuel U ua 1n the puat etl� tlo era� t � ou d r decl e hat era are en a � in hU 1ne c astwi tra e an there� entttl t he ~� n f � � f the 1 1 pine Tarif c~ f 1 , t � .~:eap tnatee o refund to �t� al co�� w.ta� iic�n�� fees in the unt of 1, pal y th to the ure at � sine� 194 up t the present n all their fi htn f the eviae " . 395 LjtJI

I � 36 - 2- c 11 � ,- ci e aatwl�� 11 �n�� .ln h futu.r � t � c :tr v facts f e c ae. � ' �� r f.n r all 0' Il r (8 f ., 1�� 1 an f!ve � - )CC � n .t' ter �� cul ly o a � ly ��� yt � �� 11 �� � cle ��� The pet1 11k iv C 1�� 2, 1 � � 1'1 1 � unt at 1se �� �ir ive t 1: 396

13, 19~ , 1 It 1 - 2, � 1n n ro CO I 1 1n1u � 1 �. 9:J � f 1 1 0 19 � lt1n ) y Ju tlc �� a tho 1 y n 1n ., 397

� 23 �4� oa 1:1.. 1 7 p � sh u c atw s trad � fu � at 'tit ra � o.. a and u er u l': au � 11 0 � 1, 0 v s ls fr l re not th f n fe l. � �� 11...rl.� . ��tt Cf)Ul - � 01' t � pur - art 1 1c � r 1l n � ., .. 39 8

-- t 11 p n 1f fe eI � - � �1� � 399

� 23 - 6- vi , lle on t the h nd. for � on h� fu�l oil 0� ec ion 21 f n strlng�nt l te �� �� t %' ppt 1fi tn th v ry � ... . . . 15 fr: fund o . c ( nt e of t 1 Lnt ot l to th ureeu t V G �1 fr 1949 t t can on ette t. 0 tn ifull in:f. i� 1 ~ of A ry f Ju i.e (E 1 A) . 0 1c w ully � �r� to � f;"t ha 1n of ., . 1100

� 23 � 7 .. no a � � (clt1n he � .... 3� 46)�. 282 �� 1 ., l � 1 1nac ate. ( .) �" ) ..... � KS' 1 oU con �� \1\1 t f �� �� ntf. � 11 t.� t �� � enel"� ny ~�� S'lctton allf cat.l � 4 01

�2 �- � t �f eaa1 1 f htl ine iff c:t of 1 at � \1ve r er � 157 hi.ch too 12. 19 2, entln � for r. 1n � cl re un 0 � bac � on el 11 c ld be 1� 1t ely rante � the ola!laant t px-ove ina (a) ha hf. vealel ts en a ed r � � or (b) etween ts 111 - pine Iela tra orei n coun ��' nited � 1~7. f their in o the n olle t llo1 o. f t ti nera' cl� re un � ( � � ���n. ) nl eat1 �t las e. theref r�� ls e- �~ he flah1n vessel� of petit nder category (c) of ecti 21 of t h!lJ.pplne 402

� -. c� tf.- f) � ., f� � /I -11 � pl - � �� c 1M l .�. . ) 11 in 11 3 i3 403

� - - l 11 c t 1� tr i�� t 1r n I r rt fan a 1� ~ to c �� 1 hl 'Y 1 r tof 1 f vr t t on � f ct th t t ov ~l xt nd�n h� c t duti rn 11 d r c: .. c 0 n y � -.. c :f.r l� 0 5 a on of f r ed c1 � .n. ). -� al th ll fi sh w � I' K at I �l X� fr � � 1n 0 . ti nera� cla f Hf 0 c� rca is� . 40 1 tl� 31. �

�T� � � 26 -l - tie 0 s. , n the d fu 1 oil used � v' 1 ioner � � y � er � � 0 � o nt t.1t1o f 1 � � there of au � 1. v � � ' Tar ff t f 1.) � 1. �A g �� 1 0 1. t � t t� c ��� l � cl � v�, 1� � � � Cuat 4 8 t the nd ecti ,. 7 1� th ut r n nc n � to coat � � � uat � 1 7. � 3?1 405

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.