CTA Case No. 2860 (Resolution)
MARIAN CLl lCS , I c., C . T . A. C S o. 2860 Petiti ner, - v rsus - E COM 1lSS10 B OF INTE NAL EV NUE, Respondent. e .2 o L u r 1 o Acting on h " 1 1 n To '1thdr w P tition For i...eview" fil d by pet 1tioner n B� reo 23,. 1907 on the ground th t the defici.ency w1thhold1nc;; tax ass s .rnent involved rein h lra y e h subj 0 comprorn ae ttle nt twe th p rti a purs nt to .x cutive rder �o. 4 , with h p ym nt by pe ition r of t t of 14, 538.00, and there bein9 no o j ction on tne p rt of respondent, �rh co r r solves, s pra d for, t o qr n.t said moti n. L t the tition for revi w be considered withdrawn nd this c e med cl ed nd terminat d. so o. ~u z n City, Me r � nila, M rch 27 , 1987. 87
More in CTA Resolutions
- MAKATI CITY AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY TREASURER v. ALLONS HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2146)
- FORTUNE CEMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6823)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-40 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-40)
- CTA Case No. 3778 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3778)
- CTA Case No. 811 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 811)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-61 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-61)
- ROSEMARIE G. CLEMENTE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, as represented by the Honorable Commissioner of Customs(CTA Case No. EB 2288)
- CTA Case No. 3030 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3030)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.