[ G. R. No. 40156. July 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40156. July 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40156
[ G. R. No. 40156. July 28, 1934 ]
EUFROSINIO SAPON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. ARSENIO LINDO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________7th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Tayabas________, dated the __________20th__________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed with the costs of both instances against the appellees.
It is further ordered that __________the appellant__________ recover from __________the appellees__________ the sum of P__78.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 113466. December 15, 1997 ](347 Phil. 555)
- [ G.R. Nos. L-46715-16. July 29, 1988 ](246 Phil. 701)
- [ G.R. No. 228281. June 14, 2021 ](903 Phil. 631)
- [ G.R. No. L-22568. February 10, 1967 ]
- G.R. No. 140679, January 14, 2004
- G.R. No. 215314, March 14, 2018
- G.R. No. 170589, April 16, 2009
- [ G.R. Nos. 118620-21. September 01, 1997 ](343 Phil. 916)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.