[ G. R. No. 39490. June 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39490. June 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39490
[ G. R. No. 39490. June 01, 1934 ]
HIGINA BELMES DE TIBAY , ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. FAUSTINO BARRERA ET AL., DEFENDANTS, JULITA IGUAR AND GRACIANO ALSOL, INTERVENORS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Camarines Sur__________, dated the__________13th______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees_________ recover from _________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-15539. January 30, 1962 ]
- [ G.R. Nos. L-36481-82. October 23, 1982 ](203 Phil. 184; 81 OG No. 37, 4051 (September 16, 1985))
- G.R. No. 189998, August 29, 2012
- G.R. No. 194931, October 06, 2021
- G.R. No. 178622, November 12, 2012
- [ G.R. Nos. L-26944-45. December 05, 1980 ](189 Phil. 405)
- [ G. R. No. 35741. December 20, 1932 ]
- [ G.R. No. 135496. July 30, 2002 ](434 Phil. 618)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.