CTA Case No. 3648 (Resolution)
/ tEhmLIC O F fHE f'I4IUPP INF� r ~OUR 0 _;� 1 '"'~ ~ .~f� PE.ALJ QUEZON C.I'TY L Con - ver c . � � C E o. 3648 IO 0 I T NL � pond n � - .. - .. X X - - ~ ... - ... - vru � � �c ~ � 3722 pond nt. ~- ~- - - - - X 0LU I0 ctin on h 0 u i s .. i l y cou l for i tion r n t r 1 , 1 t r un t the d iciency fix n rc n x a 1 cludin<J inter t nd surch rg involv d h rein h v lr y .. n s ttl by w y of co promi wi h p itione p yinq th c ro ised unt o 315,938.50 evi enc dby rox co ie f I P y rd r o. 2926295 nd Centr 1 nk nfirm i n c 1 t ~o. 737 425 h d ted w t ber 9, 19 6, and there b ing no bj ction on th p rt of r a nd nt, id ti n 1 rY o. 43 7
A - � C ~ ES 0~ 3648, 3722 s pr ye for, let th s ca a di i d and the con 1der d clo d nd t r in t d . 0 0 EO. uezon City. etro M nil , Dec r 29, 1 86 . ILLi:l resid.i: 9 Judge 438
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.