PEOPLE SUPPORT (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. (Consolidated with CTA Case No. 7651)
Republic of the Philippines COURT OF TAX APPEALS Quezon City FIRST DIVISION AEGIS PEOPLESUPPORT, INC. C.T.A Case Nos. 7591 & 7651 [Formerly: PEOPLESUPPORT Members: (PHILIPPINES), INC.], Petitioner, -versus- Acosta, Chairman, Bautista, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL Casanova, JJ. REVENUE, Promulgated: Respondent. DEC 0 3 x -------------------- - --- - --------- -- -- --- - - - - - --- --x RESOLUTION During the hearing on November 27, 2009, the Court acting on petitioner's "Motion to WithdrawPetition for Review," filed on November 19, 2009, GRANTED said motion in view of the manifestation of petitioner's counsel that petitioner's administrative claims for refund involved in these cases were granted in the reduced amounts ofP3,128,673.50 andP6,911,287.29, representing excess and untilized input VAT for the 1st and 2nd Quarters ofCY 2005. WHEREFORE, the Petitions for Review filed in these cases are hereby WITHDRAWN. These cases are now considered CLOSED AND TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. t LJ< � 0-.-A (On Official Business) ERNESTO D. ACOSTA LOVELL R. BAUTISTA Presiding Justice Associate Justice CAESA ANOVA Associate Justice 2uJ1
More in CTA Resolutions
- LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF MUNICIPALITY OF TAYTAY, PROVINCE OF RIZAL v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8550)
- PUBLICIS-AMA INCORPORATED Represented by its Court-Appointed Receiver, Atty. Fatima D. Manguiat v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7011)
- CTA Case No. 745 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 745)
- CTA Case No. O-58 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. O-58)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CARRIER AIR CONDITIONING PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1341)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, v. RONIE ROMANO EUSTAQUIO, (No. Unit 4, Solid Gold Bldg., National Highway, Brgy. Macabling, Sta. Rosa City, Laguna) -at large-(CTA Case No. O-807)
- HEALTH PRODUCTS AND SERVICES B.V., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10968)
- CTA Case No. 5193 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 5193)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.