cta_decision CTA Case No. 422422 1958-11-21

CTA Case No. 422 (Decision)

. . . . \,; t1t1 ne~: . - � r c ��� � 422 X� � � � � � � � � � � � � � X

� 22 - 2- � �� 11. e t vo t fall s.nto � ar&do. .After !%. r� P u ely t ~� u�t 2 � 1 _,, �� � t 0 a l& � Q� tO �r1.n � u t. -.-.no - � el � ) c� ta cla t 1 nice. 194 7� t � 'f tte .tt '� nt -p. ). ' � r -t r, X� aato dt p :ta cl c- �7 al 10 p t ulu n t � y lC ar. pt m r 2 , 9 tn ual lo s nd h unt of 434, !l58

459

� 42 ectl n w1t und 1 ed c in t 7, 428. ( xh. "H , r c., p. ). � 15 � t t 1"o ""r 9 1n eata or ~ cons.t- .. lgllnS l { r c., p � 69�71) at on � "J � ... p nd nt. n1 d th st Jenu y 27, 19 � f~ r c 1der t ton , th t the � fo th � t ho total au of ( h. J'�l" � c �� pp. 72� 7 ) . ... e ruary l , 1 o , e tlt on , ln n r en ' � 1 t r of J n 7, 19 � � 1 t on o �� rev ( � ... ... c �� t 10 en ed by t h :re 23, 19 ( � ... -2" 9� . ec. � � 7) 1C c ta ert te h t 1 cons 0- ce t �1 t pad or t � th r on ent v ( � "L�l" ll" . c. , p. 1 ) for h 1 tr - �� � ta � 0 :l.n o av 1 r nt lt � au of 4 , 2 9. 11 � and{ 12 � c�� � l an n ... h 161 1 ~6, the oun o 4 , ~. 22 to c v x 460

� 22 � !!l - c� .t.n � t& ( xn. " �l � HC:.., P� 82) a ot 1 � ... (a... ., � p � � St4J C "' 1-s.oner � t &y n s � r a I"Ote 1t i 0~ " �� as n a 11 � � n 2� � lt d o . al c1� t tha - 11 ~ tp � nt 1tl � 0 ru � of al ( �� � � � f, du n 0 (� � � 27} . � :>1, P n c lo nt , 0 th t - 0y c; 11 c on X . �l!J ) crlP 1 1 ( X � � r �t tf.t on r uy � � nt �� 1 l ... � � �� 19 7, tl� � � nee , 1 t It �' u e na � 11 �� � 461

11 1 � c �� � �� 0 ver � ��� 1ne ' IX t1 l' lt 462 le � ef t �( � year 1 -1 �

�4 - 7 .. J! 1 � r �� cn 11&, T ... f 1949..� AP~:nm�nt the\ titute � �to � 1 1t � y c....:one t t pel lc-�ncM � ., 22, 1957 t o tMHtDtlftClttnt be1~--�n y ~ , 19 1 to zwt....tt. f e &1aC � �~A~Q�ts.on ��� th t t peal institute oft !l. .t 1 � cr t1t1 l!e that a nl1n p1e\ely and. ft.nal ly U4!111J'V tt. c at � th.U ....1 l'1Pt1one thl ntPGIIMi\t o11ectac f te~l u atat Jn meJ:II�C''IIn4._. \bat.� 463

.- lll c: ftn 0 jul� le l r dll t t h r1 t t....as rt 1 ye c� t X ~I' . � � the th t1 06 ..1.1 �� xc:ept PJ: v fllf.n J.an ��t c. 31, Tax � at (pp. ca o � no ti ot1on 32 f fUe t ... t thle f ns� f da � ... tl- l tr t ste -lv 1 v 1n �� th atter~ 464

� ~22 - 9- h� cl sao � t 1 lnt rpot b wtt out any 11 � out in an lyz a ect1 11 f �pu l~ ..t o� 11 of t e at1 al t r � � Kt.1 465

0! �r�� . 422 -- 1ts :-1 hts to cont t tf o lo � lf.ty l. Cr.> .t c tnoatJ u.c- t assess .ont an col.l ct.~..on o-: the t x. 1.1 h u . �uch p.rott�t 1s not con~idor d n c s~ ,..y under t ~t ion 3 e~ any ~ uu nt of stoppal urtl e ~.. � 1 t ~4- *( . tat th t e dent ��lf ~as 0 f I'Gij 'ip~.. on. lh � � the t t ..o re nu exam:.tn olly 1nve�t t 1 $ inC.O ,; li� . ~the tiiOAl ye .r And aft ar! ng und � revi of tho c so . th Q � ferenc tn f tl Ul:'ef!J. 4. 1 ' ('; y aU (,.l'i n lly� n ove z: � . l t.6 r co~niz .,hat . on.. &d th QE n of r �- � crt t1on r's c 1m 0 th r th ou. "'� ~ .. nne e d n1�d. � l. d ng ( xh. u... A c., p. ~7). f . "" n� � l I) c: c rr l.n tl ferenc" taff ~ of th JJW 1V1&J.on ~ \.U u i .in rna ... �2".. � 1 It 1R r~c. � pp. 134-.L~ J. T~, 0c &..aC0$ l l t!ch ��otaios ... ... J.cate a: .a. te a6 COJl i t nt any tteory of � 1. J.n f t� 1n r lati n t:o th law Ptllnt u cleuly that. tb ������ nt a a1nst and eoll c t.io 4. 6 6

- 11 - fr pe\lt er hueln of t def~SAncy Snc t ax fu t f .tsc� l y 1 aae y .ct y \ sta u � of u.J.tation , d ureu nt t � � 1 Z), ld th re \ax tel:' th 1 4 �n l.n ly t he ����� t d eoll c.. 1 and votd. In t Vit nd a tN- diS� poling of at n !.net t r��� penca.n , o thlrd ltsue raised 1n t .v 1 4ef1C1 ncy .h hueby � su. of Th ty 'th 4 1ghte n ~entav ( ptt.IOS uoh 20, 19 6, t ro en 1t s !d. 1th &t p~ � � � � I concu a �1 467

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.