CTA Case No. 422 (Decision)
. . . . \,; t1t1 ne~: . - � r c ��� � 422 X� � � � � � � � � � � � � � X
� 22 - 2- � �� 11. e t vo t fall s.nto � ar&do. .After !%. r� P u ely t ~� u�t 2 � 1 _,, �� � t 0 a l& � Q� tO �r1.n � u t. -.-.no - � el � ) c� ta cla t 1 nice. 194 7� t � 'f tte .tt '� nt -p. ). ' � r -t r, X� aato dt p :ta cl c- �7 al 10 p t ulu n t � y lC ar. pt m r 2 , 9 tn ual lo s nd h unt of 434, !l58
459
� 42 ectl n w1t und 1 ed c in t 7, 428. ( xh. "H , r c., p. ). � 15 � t t 1"o ""r 9 1n eata or ~ cons.t- .. lgllnS l { r c., p � 69�71) at on � "J � ... p nd nt. n1 d th st Jenu y 27, 19 � f~ r c 1der t ton , th t the � fo th � t ho total au of ( h. J'�l" � c �� pp. 72� 7 ) . ... e ruary l , 1 o , e tlt on , ln n r en ' � 1 t r of J n 7, 19 � � 1 t on o �� rev ( � ... ... c �� t 10 en ed by t h :re 23, 19 ( � ... -2" 9� . ec. � � 7) 1C c ta ert te h t 1 cons 0- ce t �1 t pad or t � th r on ent v ( � "L�l" ll" . c. , p. 1 ) for h 1 tr - �� � ta � 0 :l.n o av 1 r nt lt � au of 4 , 2 9. 11 � and{ 12 � c�� � l an n ... h 161 1 ~6, the oun o 4 , ~. 22 to c v x 460
� 22 � !!l - c� .t.n � t& ( xn. " �l � HC:.., P� 82) a ot 1 � ... (a... ., � p � � St4J C "' 1-s.oner � t &y n s � r a I"Ote 1t i 0~ " �� as n a 11 � � n 2� � lt d o . al c1� t tha - 11 ~ tp � nt 1tl � 0 ru � of al ( �� � � � f, du n 0 (� � � 27} . � :>1, P n c lo nt , 0 th t - 0y c; 11 c on X . �l!J ) crlP 1 1 ( X � � r �t tf.t on r uy � � nt �� 1 l ... � � �� 19 7, tl� � � nee , 1 t It �' u e na � 11 �� � 461
11 1 � c �� � �� 0 ver � ��� 1ne ' IX t1 l' lt 462 le � ef t �( � year 1 -1 �
�4 - 7 .. J! 1 � r �� cn 11&, T ... f 1949..� AP~:nm�nt the\ titute � �to � 1 1t � y c....:one t t pel lc-�ncM � ., 22, 1957 t o tMHtDtlftClttnt be1~--�n y ~ , 19 1 to zwt....tt. f e &1aC � �~A~Q�ts.on ��� th t t peal institute oft !l. .t 1 � cr t1t1 l!e that a nl1n p1e\ely and. ft.nal ly U4!111J'V tt. c at � th.U ....1 l'1Pt1one thl ntPGIIMi\t o11ectac f te~l u atat Jn meJ:II�C''IIn4._. \bat.� 463
.- lll c: ftn 0 jul� le l r dll t t h r1 t t....as rt 1 ye c� t X ~I' . � � the th t1 06 ..1.1 �� xc:ept PJ: v fllf.n J.an ��t c. 31, Tax � at (pp. ca o � no ti ot1on 32 f fUe t ... t thle f ns� f da � ... tl- l tr t ste -lv 1 v 1n �� th atter~ 464
� ~22 - 9- h� cl sao � t 1 lnt rpot b wtt out any 11 � out in an lyz a ect1 11 f �pu l~ ..t o� 11 of t e at1 al t r � � Kt.1 465
0! �r�� . 422 -- 1ts :-1 hts to cont t tf o lo � lf.ty l. Cr.> .t c tnoatJ u.c- t assess .ont an col.l ct.~..on o-: the t x. 1.1 h u . �uch p.rott�t 1s not con~idor d n c s~ ,..y under t ~t ion 3 e~ any ~ uu nt of stoppal urtl e ~.. � 1 t ~4- *( . tat th t e dent ��lf ~as 0 f I'Gij 'ip~.. on. lh � � the t t ..o re nu exam:.tn olly 1nve�t t 1 $ inC.O ,; li� . ~the tiiOAl ye .r And aft ar! ng und � revi of tho c so . th Q � ferenc tn f tl Ul:'ef!J. 4. 1 ' ('; y aU (,.l'i n lly� n ove z: � . l t.6 r co~niz .,hat . on.. &d th QE n of r �- � crt t1on r's c 1m 0 th r th ou. "'� ~ .. nne e d n1�d. � l. d ng ( xh. u... A c., p. ~7). f . "" n� � l I) c: c rr l.n tl ferenc" taff ~ of th JJW 1V1&J.on ~ \.U u i .in rna ... �2".. � 1 It 1R r~c. � pp. 134-.L~ J. T~, 0c &..aC0$ l l t!ch ��otaios ... ... J.cate a: .a. te a6 COJl i t nt any tteory of � 1. J.n f t� 1n r lati n t:o th law Ptllnt u cleuly that. tb ������ nt a a1nst and eoll c t.io 4. 6 6
- 11 - fr pe\lt er hueln of t def~SAncy Snc t ax fu t f .tsc� l y 1 aae y .ct y \ sta u � of u.J.tation , d ureu nt t � � 1 Z), ld th re \ax tel:' th 1 4 �n l.n ly t he ����� t d eoll c.. 1 and votd. In t Vit nd a tN- diS� poling of at n !.net t r��� penca.n , o thlrd ltsue raised 1n t .v 1 4ef1C1 ncy .h hueby � su. of Th ty 'th 4 1ghte n ~entav ( ptt.IOS uoh 20, 19 6, t ro en 1t s !d. 1th &t p~ � � � � I concu a �1 467
More in CTA Decisions
- WEB-JET INVESTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10118)
- ONE WORLD CONNECTIONS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8820)
- FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10941)
- PRUDENTIAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7371)
- ARCHIPELAGO MOTOR CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1258)
- THE PHILIPPINE AMERICAN LIFE AND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ELVIRA R. VERA, THE NATIONAL EVALUATION BOARD OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8894)
- LEADWAY HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9835)
- CTA Case No. 6004 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6004)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.