CTA Case No. 747 (Decision)
r, ... .. ��� �?7 - - .... - ... ... ..... . 1 (~ - - C)I\V1 0 I n 1 1 � nl r- re 1..3........3.. ( ) n 3 12, � r .1 nc r e. t �
- � 'l 'I "' - -.. tt n by fl u.- ' '1' h t th 1 ar l r 1 voic ; rt r to e~e 11 inc t 1 t c v- r� r �t ' l 8 J'G u1 ~1 4.,.., he 1 l 3( ) r he tr v � ' in cb th ... ' i:- 125 ' .J
-� 7? - 3- o � itio r re r 1 1 t � ?,9 2� ' f' e ") . c- r rh ece 7! ll , r - .,. , c. ). l, , � '+ , . . n 0 � 'l - ' t r) 1, r c. ). ' tt1 h r .... 11 8c e l, ( c. ). , 1 1 1� v r 1 ( � 4. - 7, r s l tio � 'l ' � i- <� 1 0 t 11 ' l, ion rr u h r 7, ;I � :>) � . .t r � r) l, p � ..-3- --- -�- -- 126
� 7>+7 -- '1t1 r v e a1 0 t1 b 0 0 ol h nt � be:r 2 - 1- 5, h � court.. . 1 o in t ca . . ' � ,..21? r �c 1 tu �� t' �h without il.1tl h i 1.'11 � 'h i au r ol d in 11 cas ar l hr r in e 11 y or he 1 :r 1 o the at � h 11 , 1 ia � u b c u t 1t o Andr t ro.v. 'h Com~1 � 2179 ' � "19 ' .. c a 3 id t r p el r $P .ct tn n c�s- � 127 : f� �
c c ... � .... 7 -; - ' ' c. 3� )t 1t h 00 I 0- ... ' t 128
-or�~ . ,1'1 - 6- I n ot � An t 0 :res 0 tnt r s at tb. 1 l ' ou t. 0 surety on h c U: in r� n t ll t ti 10 r p ,. � yn prov1.d ror Y- ent ot uc 1o {s nr '. , . 't) � l I .. zaro v . Corn- 1 ion r ' ( to �J � � o . 9 )' .. 0 1 ion pen 1 .c tor io- l tion 0 b h tot 1 a o nt 0 � t 1 not " I~ 129
- - 7- 0� ? 7 se u. nt- 1lity on m e� � find no os re ' to 1at t 0 th or - $0 0 err t< in t . ois on ep- oi � ,. , HE :. c he . by artir .. d JJl ~. 1 t ir1 ing eale ro ,, e s l it er. RO\ .D . Qu zon c y, 'I ,, 1968. .... c ~30 �
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.