PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. REYNALDO A. PAZCOGUIN and RODELITO M. BIAG

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY FIRST DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, C.T.A. CRIM. CASE NO. 0-235 Plaintiff, For: Violation of Sec. 3602, in - versus - rei. to Sec. 2530, pars. (f) and (I) 3, 4, & 5, of TCCP Members: REYNALDO A. PAZCOGUIN, 772 EDSA Cor. East Ave., ACOSTA, Chairman Pinyahan, Diliman, Quezon City UY,and FASON-VICTORINO, JJ. RODE LITO M. BIAG E-74 K-Bin Townhouse, Promulgated: HAR Townville Subdivision, Project 6, 19 2012 ; Quezon City 9:to o�,.., � Accused. - ~ ----- x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - ~ - - x RESOLUTION Fabon-Victorino, .J.: In the Resolution dated October 17, 2011, the prosecution was directed to amend the Information, within ten (10) days from notice, to reflect the proper offense for which the two accused stand charged.

Resolution C. T.A. Case No. 0 -235 Subsequently or on October 21, 2011, the prosecution was granted a period of ten ( 10) days from notice, within which to comment on accused Pazcoguin, Jr.'s prayer for reduction of bail. For failure to comply with the foregoing directives despite notice, the Court, on November 25, 2011, granted accused Pazcoguin, Jr.'s Motion for Reduction of Bail, and the prosecution a final period of ten (10) days from notice, to comply with the Resolution of October 17, 2011 for the amendment of the Information. Again, the prosecution failed to comply, prompting the Court to issue a Resolution dated January 30, 2012, directing the prosecution to show cause, within ten (10) days from notice, why the instant case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the same Resolution, the prosecution was directed as well to inform the Court of the correct and complete name of the person charged in this case bearing the surname PAZCOGUIN. As stated in the Records Verification dated February 24, 2012, the prosecution has not complied with the Court Resolution dated January 30, 2012.

Resolution C. T.A. Case No. 0-235 In view of the foregoing, the instant case is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED . We Concur: ~_..;;-LA � \)_,_ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Justice ER~U' Y Associate Justice