[ G. R. No. 40343. June 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40343. June 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40343
[ G. R. No. 40343. June 06, 1934 ]
ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JOSE SAIZON, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Rizal__________, dated the__________14th______________ day of __________July_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, without costs in view of the fact that this is a pauper's appeal.
It is further ordered that _________xxx__________xxx__________xxx__________ recover from __________xxs__________xxx the sum of P __xxx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 224943. March 20, 2017 ](807 Phil. 765)
- [ G.R. No. 22073. September 25, 1924 ](G.R. No. 22073)
- G.R. No. 183658, April 10, 2013
- [ G. R. No. 32502. March 18, 1930 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-26700. May 15, 1969 ](138 Phil. 69)
- [ G.R. No. 189755. July 04, 2012 ](690 Phil. 321)
- G.R. No. 91483, November 18, 1997
- [ G.R. No. 30686. August 12, 1929 ](G.R. No. 30686)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.