[ G. R. No. 39491. June 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39491. June 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39491
[ G. R. No. 39491. June 01, 1934 ]
HIGINA BELMES DE TIBAY , ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. JULITA IGUAR ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Camarines Sur__________, dated the__________13th______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees_________ recover from _________the appellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 8315. February 18, 1914 ](G.R. No. 8315)
- [ G.R. Nos. 63786-87. April 07, 1993 ](293 Phil. 117; 90 OG No. 22, 3059 (May 30, 1994))
- [ G.R. NO. 149053. March 07, 2007 ](546 Phil. 479)
- [ G.R. No. 176709. May 08, 2009 ](605 Phil. 689)
- [ G. R. No. L-2861. February 26, 1951 ]
- [ G.R. No. 3026. March 26, 1911 ](G.R. No. 3026)
- [ G.R. No. 163013. April 30, 2008 ](576 Phil. 228)
- [ G.R. No. 266921. January 22, 2024 ](950 Phil. 165)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.